View Full Version : Baby Girls Are Circumcised Too
Unregistered
June 24th, 2012, 17:46
aandes.blogspot.ca/2010/04/circumcision.html
Attacking children's genitals. Pure jealousy and envy by the old adults for the perfect newborn at the very beginning of her life. Innocent, untainted, pure, whole, perfect. Uncorrupted.
It really is too much for some to bear. They must get out their knives and make their mark. They must exert their authority and power.
Clearly much less severe than American MGM but all the same factors are involved.
A YouTube discussion of the matter can be found here
youtube.com/watch?v=K9ODKJ9jsu4&feature=plcp
Unregistered
June 25th, 2012, 09:40
A fabulous response follows.
Patricia said...
We've all been duped - Jews, Christians and Muslims. Circumcision hurts children and the adults they become and God has no interest in hurting children. I suspect that you too don't want to hurt children, but someone told you that God likes to have children's genitals cut. Somewhere, sometime, someone, long ago and far away decided that hurting children was an interesting or personally rewarding thing to do... and so they blamed their urge to harm children's sexual organs on God, realizing that if they told us that God required it, no one would be able to refuse.
They used to circumcise little girls in the USA. And I have written a book about it. I am very aware of how painful cutting genitals is and how very painful it is to live life with that alteration. I thought I was normal but I never could understand why women thought and felt the way they did. I identified more with the way men thought and felt. When I finally realized I'd been circumcised, I realized that it is not 'natural masculinity' we see in America - it is 'traumatized person'. Many men have PTSD due to circumcision. What do people with PTSD do? They exhibit symptoms of fear; they either cower and hide or they posture and behave in an angry and aggressive manner.
There are only three cultures that circumcise their young and they are the three Abrahamic traditions. The world will be a much kinder, gentler, sweeter, healthier, happier place when we stop hurting our children unnecessarily. Scour your scriptures. Do they really command, demand that you hurt your children in this way? No, they don't. The original history of the Jewish people - The Book of J - does not contain a circumcision covenant. God has no interest in cutting the genitals of your children.
Is it really 'cleaner' to cut genital tissue than to wash it? No, it isn't. Would you feel safe if someone was to hold you down and cut your genitals? No, you wouldn't. Would you trust that person? No, you wouldn't. Please don't just follow the crowd. Your children deserve to have their private parts kept private and they deserve your loving protection. Please do whatever it takes to keep your children safe from the hands and knives of adults who take great satisfaction in handling and cutting children's private parts.
I only would clarify that Jews duped [some of] their foreskinned, sexual-supermen oppressors into having their penises defiled like theirs. Circumcision in Christian doctrine always has been detestable, anti-Christian, anathema to every essence of Jesus' teachings, an abominable, satanic act representing undue concern with the fallen world of flesh and blood.
Lacey
January 17th, 2013, 13:34
Up until 1976, Blue Shield (insurance company) paid for female circumcision in the USA. The magazine Cosmopolitan even recommended adult female circumcision as a cure for "female frigidity," and thousands of women consequently followed their advice.
MJOLNIR
January 27th, 2013, 23:10
^And of course...MGM couldn't be declared as that (MGM) and continued due to, you guessed it! The Jewish lobby in congress. If it wasn't for them, it would be viewed as FGM (the clitoral-hood cutting sense, since if Jewish deceit in America was out, then there would be NO MORE denial of this and FAR MORE awareness to the equality between these two types of mutilations (foreskin and clitoral hood cutting)).
Unregistered
April 12th, 2013, 04:03
I think both MGM and FGM are wrong and if a mother tries to circumcise her son first she should be circumcised and if a wife tries to circumcise her wife first she should be circumcised. and never ever date or marry women who insist for circumcised penises.
Aspie
April 14th, 2013, 13:52
^And of course...MGM couldn't be declared as that (MGM) and continued due to, you guessed it! The Jewish lobby in congress. If it wasn't for them, it would be viewed as FGM (the clitoral-hood cutting sense, since if Jewish deceit in America was out, then there would be NO MORE denial of this and FAR MORE awareness to the equality between these two types of mutilations (foreskin and clitoral hood cutting)).
You need to learn the history of circumcision in the United States because what you have said is not the truth it is a lie. Quite honestly at best it comes off as appearing anti-semetic because you are absolving non-Jews of their guilt while saddling Jews with undue guilt.
vBulletin® v3.7.2, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.