PDA

View Full Version : 2008-10-07 Vos Iz Neias? - Supreme Court Turns Away Oregon Circ' Case


Joseph
October 6th, 2008, 18:39
Surprizingly, one of the least biased articles on this case that I've read.

http://www.vosizneias.com/21124/2008/10/06/washington-dc-supreme-court-turns-away-oregon-circumcision-case/

Washington, DC - Supreme Court Turns Away Oregon Circumcision Case

Washington, DC - The U.S. Supreme Court declined to take up an Oregon dispute between a father who wants to circumcise his 13-year-old son against the wishes of the boy's mother.

The case now goes back to an Oregon trial judge to determine whether the boy wants to undergo the procedure.

James Boldt, a former Southern Oregon resident who converted to Judaism, says his son wants to be circumcised for religious reasons. Lia Boldt claims her son is afraid to tell his father that he does not want to undergo the procedure.

The Boldts married in the early 1990s. She filed for divorce in 1998. The boy initially lived with his mother, but the father later gained custody.

James Boldt started studying Judaism in 1999 and eventually converted. James Boldt claims that as the custodial parent he has a constitutional right to raise his son in his religion.

The Oregon Supreme Court earlier this year did not rule on the substance of the dispute, but said the trial judge needed to determine the boy's wishes before deciding which parent to side with.

z726
October 6th, 2008, 21:00
It's not biased because there's no commentary by some journalist trying to get paid to editorialize. I prefer it when they publish just the facts.

This was posted earlier at The Oregonian website, also with a comment section: http://www.oregonlive.com/news/index.ssf/2008/10/supreme_court_turns_away_orego.html

Joseph
October 7th, 2008, 10:31
HAH! I've written to Tony "Ashbel" Green before. If HE wrote this, it is most definitely an improvement.

Joseph
October 8th, 2008, 04:26
There is one burning question:

If the father would have us believe his son wants to get circumcised, WHY did he try to appeal to the Supreme Court?

I mean, since the ruling was that the boy would decide, then it should be a win for the father.

Joseph
November 12th, 2008, 22:27
Terminally ill British girl with leukemia, 13, has the power to refuse an unwanted heart transplant.

http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1858427,00.html

http://www.fiercehealthcare.com/story/teen-wins-right-return-home-die/2008-11-12

http://www.findingdulcinea.com/news/health/2008/November/British-Court-Allows-Terminally-Ill-Teen-to-Refuse-Heart-Transplant.html

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,24637947-2703,00.html

And yet none of the Oregon courts have {yet} bothered to ask this young boy, now 13, his opinion on the circumcision of his own penis. And there's nothing even WRONG with him!!!

:mad: