PDA

View Full Version : Speaking of masturbation....


BodyArt
January 3rd, 2007, 09:45
(Nice Title, eh?)

I used to masturbate running my hand over the upper shaft and glans with lotion, lubricant or saliva, or I else would be raw and desensitized. After using the TLC Tugger for over 2 months, I masturbated a couple of times over the last week grasping the center of the shaft and running the newly grown foreskin over the corona and glans. Not a drop of lubricant was used, and I'll tell you, I felt like a teenager again. The sensation is completely new and different, and I'm assuming it's because of the nerve endings and glans becoming more sensative to the inner skin. I was never able to get the skin on my shaft to do this before, and I can't wait to see what it's like in 6 months or a year of using the TLC Tugger! (Thank you, Ron!)

charley76
January 3rd, 2007, 17:11
BodyArt,
I am there with you my friend. I was speaking recently to another member here and he was talking about this intensified sensation during self-stimulation and I was saying "yeah yeah, I know it's great right?", and he was saying "yeah, it's so great that I almost got myself in trouble masturbating all the time and not getting anything else done". Well since that conversation, my own progress is such that I want to masturbate all the time because not only is it easier but it actually feels better and I also feel like my erections are stronger when I do it. I also can almost just pull the skin back and shake it now and there is an amazing sensation in the frenulum that I never knew before. I've only been resotoring about two months, so I feel very excited about this process and the progress I will see further on down the line.

Congratulaions, keep it up.
charley76

David
January 6th, 2007, 19:03
Having masturbated while intact, cut, and restored -- I noticed that it is not all that uncommon for cut guys to have a penis rubbed raw by masturbation, while it is very, very rare for intact/restored guys. Maybe the penis was designed that way. Oh, yeah -- it was!

nuuu4
January 8th, 2007, 18:58
David - you are lucky (in a way - at least compared to those that were cut at birth) to have experienced sexual pleasure in all three states. We all know that intact is the best and cut is the worst. Since I have been restoring I have definitely noticed significant improvement in sexual pleasure. I have always been able to pull my skin over my glans but since restoring the inner skin and the glans are much more sensitive and there is a definite interaction when the skin is pulled over the glans that was not there before. I am very encouraged by this (although somewhat disappointed with slow skin growth). I am very curious - now that you are restored to what percentage to you think your sexual pleasure has been returned when compared to your pre-cut status?:)

David
January 8th, 2007, 20:31
You asked how I would "rate" restored to cut and intact. I say that intact my sex life was a 10, cut it was a 3, and restored it is a 7. I'll never be a 10 again (only God can make a perfect penis), but 7 is a helluva lot better than a 3!

nuuu4
January 10th, 2007, 18:42
I wish I could experience a 10 but I will settle for a 7 (it's not like I have a choice). I was also wondering how the improvements work with progress. I have noticed an initial improvement in sensitivity because the glans and inner skin are covered and are kept moist. I expect that once I develop more skin and can experience the rolling effect there will be further enhancements to the experience. I am thinking that the fact that during the restoration process that restorers are constantly stressing the skin and have the silicone on the glans most of the time; that this is counter productive to the sensitivity issue. Thus, I am hopeful that once I am finished restoring and can throw away my tugger (as much as I like it I can't wait to be rid of it) that the ultimate pleasure factor can be achieved. In all, there would be 3 stages of pleasure enhancement. Do you agree, or have you experienced something different? If this is so, how long after the restoration process is finished does it take to develop the maximum sensitivity?

David
January 10th, 2007, 20:18
I did restoration 1987-88, using only homemade devices (that was all we had in those days). I started with an X-tape, then a tape ring, then a homemade device with a weight that hung down my leg, a modified baby bottle nipple inside the bunched up skin (held closed by a tape ring). Therefore there was very little touching the glans except skin at first, then smooth rubber. So I didn't really have a "second stage." (One interesting thing that happened was one time when I masturbated with the tape ring on. It reminded me of being intact, when the frenar band stimulated the corona on the downstroke and the upstroke. I only was able to do that one time with the tape ring, but it was great!) :)

Sanji
February 9th, 2007, 14:00
You asked how I would "rate" restored to cut and intact. I say that intact my sex life was a 10, cut it was a 3, and restored it is a 7. I'll never be a 10 again (only God can make a perfect penis), but 7 is a helluva lot better than a 3!

If people like yourself started an initiative in stem cell science to research regrowth of foreskin nerves and tissue, then it may be possible to regain an actual foreskin.

ss748
May 22nd, 2007, 12:20
I remember a while ago that there was mention that in the victorian era when this procedure started to become popular and people were very very anti sex. And that it was from this time period that circumcision was considered "cleaner" because it was thought to reduce sexual urges. The show or article showed devices from the time used to prevent boys from having erections or nocturnal emission (think a cage, sometimes with spikes). why did we get rid of some barbaric tendencies from this time but not the most permanent.

If people like yourself started an initiative in stem cell science to research regrowth of foreskin nerves and tissue, then it may be possible to regain an actual foreskin.

I think waiting for that is gonna be unlikely to happen in our lifetimes, at least for "non-life saving applications"

David
May 22nd, 2007, 19:45
I think the way persons in the Victorian Era thought that circumcision would "cure" masturbation (which they believed could cause alcoholism, insanity, and even death) was that removing the foreskin would take away the glans-stimulator. I guess it never occured to them that cut males could also masturbate! :D

ron1
March 14th, 2009, 16:11
I have heard different opionions about the loss of sensation - this refererring to the 10/7/3 things posted. I have heard cut men say that they lost anywhere from 1/3 to 2/3. the sensations. So it does seem that there is a loss of sensation, with the degree varying. Also, other factors would come into play: ie. removal of the frenulum.

Either way, I can say that my sensation is better: circed at birth, but now a C4. I am glad I have ffound out about restoration.

unregistered
April 16th, 2009, 10:43
i do the same thing but also generally use a cock ring

Americut
May 30th, 2009, 20:28
I was wondering if any of the guy's with a frenulum or frenulum remnant have ever tried stimulating it with pressurized water. You know, like some women do with their detachable shower heads. If not that, what about vibration such as body a massager?

TLCTugger
May 31st, 2009, 00:08
I was wondering if any of the guy's with a frenulum or frenulum remnant have ever tried stimulating it with pressurized water. You know, like some women do with their detachable shower heads. If not that, what about vibration such as body a massager?

Let me just say Alice and I both miss the Jado hand-held shower head we installed in our last house.

finman
May 31st, 2009, 01:19
You mean to say you use a SHOWER??? That was never in the plan when you were circumcised as an infant for 'hygiene' reasons.

Too much talk of showers will take away a useful income stream for doctors. They have bills to pay too, like repayments on luxury cars, luxury homes, golf club fees, foreign holidays and casino chips.

How does a cock-ring help with loss of sensation, please? Incidentally I have never used one.

cobra
May 31st, 2009, 01:55
I have used a shower sprayer to masturbate. Just spraying the fren remnants have brought to me a shuddering good orgasm. How can it be dirty when I got it so clean?

Americut
May 31st, 2009, 02:19
Let me just say Alice and I both miss the Jado hand-held shower head we installed in our last house.
:p

You mean to say you use a SHOWER??? That was never in the plan when you were circumcised as an infant for 'hygiene' reasons.
True. To be quite honest, my functioning shower is just a cover up. I'm above all that hygiene shit.
:rolleyes:

I have used a shower sprayer to masturbate. Just spraying the fren remnants have brought to me a shuddering good orgasm. How can it be dirty when I got it so clean?
I did it today, for the first time in...... it's nearly impossible to remember. Its also pretty hard to believe. I used to do it when I was a child. I had orgasms for about 4-5 years before I even hit puberty. I still think back in a "wtf?" state of mind.

finman
May 31st, 2009, 10:44
One reason to circumcise given by an Australian doctor was to conserve water wasted washing an uncircumcised penis. Maybe the water is needed to water the golf course or clean the doctor's limousine.

Maybe by circumcising girls, even more water could be saved, leaving enough to power wash the yacht.

The only good use of the water saved would be to drown the doctor suggesting or performing the circumcisions :):):)

Unregistered
May 31st, 2009, 18:20
This thread is so funny. It makes me crack up laughing. It's great you guys have such a sense of humor over here.

Tally
May 31st, 2009, 21:46
I was wondering if any of the guy's with a frenulum or frenulum remnant have ever tried stimulating it with pressurized water. You know, like some women do with their detachable shower heads. If not that, what about vibration such as body a massager?
Everyone's response to this is getting me pissed at my doctor, again.

Before restoring, my frenulum remnant was painful to touch. I always thought I had an open sore in that area because the area around my frenulum remnant was brown and crusty hard with the gaps between the crusty areas being red and sensitive (which I now realize was my inner foreskin that never keratinized). Talking with others, it seems that during circumcision I most likely got scarred during circumcision by the forceps wielded by the doctor. :mad:

My frenulum is not sensitive enough for me to get off from stimulation. After being retained continuously for several months, my frenulum is about as sensitive as my inner foreskin. Thankfully, it is not painful any more.

Americut
June 1st, 2009, 03:20
Aw man I'm sorry, Tally :(. Its really incredibly unfair. I mean... I'm only lucky to have whats left of mine... yet thats all I get as a man?!?!? I know it could be worse. I could have been left with nothing. I know lots of men have nothing left. But what the F*** kind of reasoning is that, when considering that we ALL should have what we were born with. Theres no justification for this pain. none.

Tally
June 1st, 2009, 11:20
Its really incredibly unfair.
Before I learned about restoring, I thought I had a normal penis. Sure, my frenulum remnant hurt if I stroked it, but I thought that was normal. It would hurt if I poked myself in the eye, too. You just learn not to do certain things.

I must have skipped school the day they handed out the user's manual. :confused: Now that I've begun restoring and learning how everything is supposed to work, I realize how messed up circumcision is. At least as restorers we have hope for improvement.