PDA

View Full Version : 2009-07-25 The Local (Sweden) - Swedish doctors refuse to circumcise boys


admin
July 26th, 2009, 13:33
Swedish doctors refuse to circumcise boys

http://www.thelocal.se/20900/20090725/

Many doctors and several local authorities in Sweden refuse to circumcise boys unless it is medically motivated, reported Dagens Nyheter (DN) newspaper.

related stories:
- Swedish hospitals fail to report patient injuries (13 Jul 09)
- Couple dubbed racists in son's health records (13 Jul 09)
- How do I know whether my doctor is any good? (10 Jul 09)

Gunnar Göthberg, chairman of the Swedish Pediatric Surgeons Association (Svensk barnkirurgisk förening), compared the procedure to female genital mutilation.

A survey done by the association reported that two of three pediatric surgeons do not want to perform circumcision. Göthberg regards the operation as an assault since the procedure is done without the child's consent.

Dagens Nyheter reported that 12 of 21 local municipalities also refuse to perform circumcisions for non-medical reasons.

Around 3,000 circumcisions are estimated to be done in Sweden each year. Of these, around 2,000 are performed by people who are not doctors and who do not have a medical license, which pose risks for the child and lead to complications.

Circumcision of boys for non-medical reasons is permitted in Sweden, and the Swedish Board of Health and Welfare (Socialstyrelsen) is of the opinion that a prohibition would be an illegal limitation on religious freedom.

The authority has proposed that the issue should be legally regulated and that all municipalities should offer male circumcision for non-medical reasons. The Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions believes that a formal recommendation would be sufficient.

Critics claim that non-medical circumcision is in violation of the United Nation's Declaration of the Rights of the Child, reported DN.

{follow link to read and leave comments}

imahokie
July 26th, 2009, 15:45
hmmm sounds like Sweden is close to doing away with the procedure altogether. At the very least it seems to be regarded as a strange thing to do.

finman
July 26th, 2009, 17:51
all municipalities should offer male circumcision for non-medical reasons

Seems like the reverse to me, a backward step offering circumcision.

imahokie
July 26th, 2009, 18:00
Oh yeah you're right. I stopped reading half way down. Darn.

Joseph
July 26th, 2009, 18:09
It's here too...

http://www.upi.com/Health_News/2009/07/25/Many-Swedish-doctors-oppose-circumcision/UPI-87341248545759/

z726
July 26th, 2009, 18:36
Then the question is whether those two out of three doctors will form enough of an opposition to prevent the board of health and welfare from requiring circumcision to be offered in any municipality.

Another question is why they only surveyed three doctors. :D

Joseph
July 26th, 2009, 20:19
Long thread of stuff and fluff from advocates... already left my two cents... others should too.

It's entertaining how it's about doctors, not mohels refusing to circumcise, yet advocates have to make it all about "religion."

Geez.

imahokie
July 26th, 2009, 20:23
Freedom of religion is an awful reason. I would go into here, but thats preaching to the choir.

Joseph
July 26th, 2009, 20:49
I would go in there anyway.

Every voice helps, I think.

Religion is actually quite hard to talk against, as you can't reason with such people rationally. Religion is, by definition, belief in the irrational without any proof.

If it can be proven, it's not faith then, is it.

One thing's for sure though; a doctor's duty is to medicine and has no business performing needless mutilation for "religious" or "traditional" purposes.

Yes, I know, it's preaching to the choir, but I don't think it can be stressed enough.

Go in there anyway. Nothing ever got achieved by remaining silent...

Remember "Horton Hears a Who" ;)