PDA

View Full Version : A huge penis or a foreskin


overhangme
April 6th, 2010, 06:15
Size matters they say. I used to obsess over my size despite the fact that I was born with a very large size. My obsession led me to join forums concerned with size matter issues instead of foreskin issues because of my ignorance of the tremendous feelings I was missing out on. After I got seriously involve with foreskin restoration I gave up trying to be the size of a 12 inch ruler.

So now after five years of gaining a lot of sensitivity and skin, I've been wondering if I had to choose, would I be willing to be 4 inches erect with a small girth and a foreskin to die for, or be huge, like the porn star Mandingo, without a foreskin. Knowing what I know now, I would die to have a small dick with a foreskin like the statue of David by Michelangelo. Most people would find that a rather shocking position given our current cultural preference for "the bigger the better".

I know it's not ideal to have a small penis given the fact that I am a victim of that cultural preference for bigger things, but going from a dekeranatized, dull penis to one that feels awesome changes ones attitude, at least it did mine. I'm not suggesting having a small penis is cool, far from it. What I'm suggesting is that it's by far more important to have a foreskin wrapped around your penis. Having a big penis is just icing on the cake! How about you? What would you choose?

mattboy115
April 6th, 2010, 13:14
Well, I was naturally gifted with a near seven incher. I really wouldn't change the size for anything with all the stories I've heard about guys getting all depressed and suicidal over a small wiener. That would scare the hell out of me. I hate to say it but I would pick size.

cobra
April 6th, 2010, 14:30
Do guys get suicidal over the size of their pickle? Gives new meaning to the phrase "he was hung".

I went through a phase of wanting a bigger ding dong, but I eventually realized that my penis size was fine. It felt small because it was missing a bunch of skin that was supposed to be there. After restoring for a while, I just didn't care how long it measured, because it felt big.

I wonder if there is such an obsession with penis size in cultures that do not circumcise. It would be interesting to see how many penis enlargement advertisements are on euro tv, magazines and etc compared to the usa. Seems like that's all you see late at night on cable here. It gets pretty annoying.

Oh-- FTR, I chose small penis with foreskin. What are you going to do with a big numb dick? Look at it?

RandyL
April 6th, 2010, 15:24
I voted for a big cock without foreskin. Because most women won't really understand the benefit of a foreskin without having it explained to them. And if I had a huge cock that was 6 inches long even when fully soft, I could walk around at a nudist resort or in the locker room at a gym and let everyone see it, and whatever lucky girl I was seeing at the time would be getting her pussy spread wide and deep from my cock!

Then I could start restoring my foreskin on the big cock.

Having a foreskin on a tiny cock would have the overbearing problem of having a tiny cock, only I'd really know the benefit of the foreskin.

So I think having a foreskin is important, but having a big cock is even MORE important.:cool:

My cock is 6.25" long and 5.25" around when hard, and 3-4" when soft. So it's not huge, but it's at least average on any size chart I've ever seen, and no woman should think I'm small.

hopeforemore237
April 6th, 2010, 16:37
I voted for huge penis without a foreskin. I unlike most circumcised guys here have not had problems with sensitivity, so the way I look at it is, with a huge circumcised penis you can at least restore your foreskin. With a small penis but uncircumcised, you can't really grow a huge penis.

m4hornets
April 6th, 2010, 16:56
i'd rather have a(n) (even) big(ger) cock, because i dont know the full extent of what im missing without a foreskin, i only have an idea. and as long as i have some degree of sensitivity (post restoration) im ok with it

Americut
April 6th, 2010, 19:21
I've never wanted to be any bigger than I am (much less "huge"), so I wouldn't go with that. I'm exactly 6" erect, and would be fine being a bit shorter. Reason being, I sometimes bump into my partner's cervix when we have sex, and she doesn't like that. Therefore, I don't like it. In fact, I'd hate to be any longer. She likes lots of pubic mound contact for her clit, and our bodies pressed together. Being longer could ruin that. Now if her vagina were longer too well... haha. Anyway. All things considered, my choice would be small and natural. Just seems more practical.

jboitx
April 6th, 2010, 19:44
My guy isn't big, but I'd rather have a foreskin with attached frenulum than a big cock. Big cock, small cock, either way it gets me off... =P

greg_b
April 6th, 2010, 20:14
"The foreskin isn't the wrapper...it's the candy."

I will take fully functioning and feeling over size any day.

Regards

SamJS
April 6th, 2010, 20:42
Foreskin ftw!

admin
April 6th, 2010, 23:22
I seriously had to ponder this. The reason is that I was projecting onto the question something that isn't there; I was imagining the two choices as more EQUAL:

A) parents CHOSE a surgery that made the penis small.

vs

B) parents CHOSE a surgery that took away the best part.

mattboy115
April 6th, 2010, 23:38
Wow. I'm glad so many people agreed with me. I thought my answer was blasphemy on this site.:D

Dachstein
April 7th, 2010, 02:08
To answer this I guess i'd need clarification on how small, and how big. I'd be willing to sacrifice a little size for my foreskin back, but i don't want a 2 inch penis.

alibi
April 7th, 2010, 05:59
Being "blessed" with an 8" penis, i would definitely choose a small penis with a foreskin.

With penis size, many people don't understand that there are also downsides to having a larger package. Men with large penises have more problems with "keeping it up" and, in my experience, larger penises seem to be less sensitive.

Also, people sometimes expect you to be a perfect "stud" and someone who can't get enough of sex (my experience) - that's maybe interesting for an evening or two, but it wears off quickly. Finally, i sometimes get the feeling that people are more interested in my penis than in the rest of my body (that is - when i'm in bed with someone)...

Dr. Cool
April 7th, 2010, 12:08
"The foreskin isn't the wrapper...it's the candy."

I will take fully functioning and feeling over size any day.

Regards

Well said greg_b, the real question here should involve qualifiers. Consider this question: "do you prefer a smaller healthy and fully functional uncircumcised penis or a larger, unhealthy and barely functional circumcised penis?" My answer would clearly be *a smaller, healthy and fully functional uncircumcised penis*. Or in other words, given that circumcision will most surely affect sexual performance for most men, the choice is between *PERFORMANCE* and *SIZE*, and in this case I clearly choose performance.

As my wife says, "size can't matter if the owner can't deliver..."

I say that from my own experience: I have a nicely sized member (7"), which makes a particularly good impression on the ladies given that I'm a short man (5'6", you know, you beat their expectations...). I had however erectile problems until one year ago, and now I know that they were clearly related to loss of sensitivity due to circumcision. Restoring helped me to get back part of what I've lost since a child, but I'm very sincere here when I say that I would easily accept a one inch loss in size or more in exchange for a penis that is always hard when I want it to be hard. This is why restoration has been such a huge blessing in my life.

That's BTW the reason why I won't do PE exercises: after experiencing ED, it wouldn't make any sense to me to risk reducing performance with potentially dangerous exercises, only to achieve marginal gains in size.

1Taoist
April 7th, 2010, 13:18
I was listening to Janice Dickinson on Howard Stern talk about all the dudes she's balled and she said Liam Neeson was huge and Mick Jagger was like an infant. Then she said it didn't matter. I think this is a good example. You can be a small-cocked giant or a big-cocked giant, but if you're a giant you're a giant. A giant with a small functional cock is just as interesting as a giant with a damaged big one.

I would take the David cock. He was a giant with a small intact cock. But then again, there are days when I'd like a Mandingo cock (even cut, if had be). Mine is in the large size anyway, and my wife comments on it often. One time I got a handjob from a female massuese who cooed "you've got a big one", and that's true but perception is everything. I've got an impressive physique, am handsome as all hell, and with a larger than average penis which I put prominently on display when active. Women probably don't really notice Mick's small weiner because he is such a giant entity, and even if they do they still adjust to it being functional cuz he's Mick Jagger.

Those above- don't claim you'll take the big cut dick and restore. That's bein a douche. This ain't some trick question that you can beat with your clever restorer logic. How important is your dick function vs perception?

Randy- you been watching too much monsters of cock porn. :-D

Honestly, the big dick thing is a shallow effect. The foreskin is subtler, but more profound. Just depends on your psyche, I guess. Shallow or profound. Or both.

mewpokemon
April 7th, 2010, 17:22
Yes... Given the situation that the guys here mostly suffered RMGM and never knew what it was to be intact, I doubt this poll has any statistcal merit. But I'm still amazed.

1Taoist
April 7th, 2010, 17:50
Hi,
I'm new here but I just want to say I have a big penis (13in) and it's uncut. I'm here to say that having a big, uncut cock is NOT what it's cracked up to be. I'm never sure if people like me, or my size, or my foreskin. People are always naming my dick. One girl likes to call it "oroboros" cuz I can suck it with her. Ever give yourself head while your girl helps? Didn't think so. She is always tryin to get the jizz all over my face instead of hers.

My penis also changes colors. Sometimes it's white, sometimes it's mulatto, and others it actually turns purple. That one she calls my John Henry.

I'm ok with the way my penis is, it's just tough sometimes when you can actually fuck your own ass and not get aids, make women scream, and get a double-hand handjob on your skintube AND get your glans sucked. Oh, and did I mention that I don't get near enough cuddling, or my emotional needs met?

Daniel Thomas
April 7th, 2010, 17:51
Id rather a big cut cock than a small uncut cock, but id rather a normal size uncut cock than a large cut one.

1Taoist
April 7th, 2010, 18:53
What?

1Taoist
April 7th, 2010, 18:56
I'd rather have a big cock uncut than a big cock with a small cut but I'd also prefer an uncut smallcock than a cut bigcock with smallpox.

metalwhere
April 7th, 2010, 18:58
I'll keep my 'perfect' cock (not my words I swear!), and I will raise a foreskin if I must.

Though if my options are one or the other, Foreskin! Hands down!

I am also a bit surprised by the results so far, considering the crowd.

Chipperman
April 7th, 2010, 20:55
Aren't you guys aware that a female's vagina forms to basically any size penis? A 4 inch erection would be fine, as would a larger 7 inch erection. It really doesn't matter, I suppose our society "thinks" it matters because we are all circumcised. Girls think that because sex doesn't feel good it is the size that matters when it is the fact we are all cut.

I was really surprised that not everyone chose the foreskin, I would take foreskin over size any day, any month, any year, any planet, any solar system, etc. I would take a 2 inch erect penis for my foreskin back, fuck, masturbating with a foreskin is to me better than cut sex.

cobra
April 8th, 2010, 06:07
I think the guys saying "big dick" are generally men who have not gotten really far restoring and still have that missing sensation, which translates in their brain as "my dick is too small". Just my opinion. I would have aswered the same way when I was first restoring.

SamJS
April 8th, 2010, 10:32
I agree with Chipperman. I'm really surprised at how split the results are. Especially in a restoring forum. I'd rather enjoy the experience, and like Chipperman said, even if I didn't get any girls, which I'm not even sure would be the case, it would still feel amazing on my own, and I'd take feeling over no feeling any day.

beachcowboy
April 8th, 2010, 11:11
I will take the foreskin hands down! It really amazes me to see the comments about the size. I am by no means big, but I like my dick. I would much rather have the sensitivity. What I have gained so far in sensitivity has made a huge difference in my sex life as well as for my wife.

mewpokemon
April 8th, 2010, 11:33
Cobra... I think you are right. I'm guessing they don't fully appreciate the "beauty" of the form and function.

Tally
April 8th, 2010, 13:55
It would be interesting to see if there is a correlation of those wanting bigger cut dicks being new restorers versus those preferring a smaller intact dick being the ones closer to being fully restored.

Until the foreskin is restored to a certain point, it is is hard to appreciate the difference that a foreskin makes. In the beginning, we restore on faith that what we hear is correct. We don't truly understand the difference until we experience it, which happens only after we have been restoring for a long time.

I have restored to the point where I know how much difference having a foreskin makes during masturbation. :D I have noticed the difference during sex, but I still have a bit to go to reach the orgasms that others describe. :) There is no question in my mind that a fully functioning penis of any size is much better than a circumcised penis of any size.

Dr. Cool
April 9th, 2010, 12:32
Age also probably matters. When I was younger I didn't have so much of a sensitivity problem, it got much worse when I got in my late thirties. So I wouldn't be surprised if the very young folks around think functionality and performance are overrated.

1Taoist
April 9th, 2010, 19:05
What is this, a fuckin figure-skating analysis?

Drew1981
April 11th, 2010, 16:05
I'd definitely go with a big cut cock. Right now I'm a shower. I'm not gigantic, but my cock stays nicely plump most of the time, so most guys at the gym see it and figure "If it's that big now, it must get really huge when it's hard". I was clueless about this until recently. I've been working out at my university's gym for 3 years, and I often see a lot of my friends in the change rooms and showers. I was at lunch with a friend of my a few months ago, and he was talking about the fact that he never showers at the gym because he has a small cock. He said "If I had a big cock like yours, I'd show it off too". Now he doesn't shower, so he's never seen it, and I asked him what he was talking about. "Everyone knows you have a big cock, because everyone who's seen it talks about it. It's one of the main characteristics that come to mind when people talk about you. You're a really great guy, and you're hung like a horse". It made me laugh, and when I asked around, my other friends confirmed that everyone knew that about me. I wasn't about to go around correcting that rumour ;)


And I like to spend most of my time at home naked. I love the way my cock hangs and swings, and I wouldn't trade that for a foreskin. I don't have any problem or hang ups about being cut, it's something I can and am dealing with, but I think I'd have a problem with having a small cock. What's the point in gaining a foreskin if I'd be too embarrassed to share it with anyone?

1Taoist
April 12th, 2010, 22:14
This post has some really odd overtones to it but it interesting. This guy isn't lookin to date a cock- he's already in love with his. And he doesn't even care if it's cut, really, just that it's some sorta myth. I could go on and on, but I think we get the point.

KniteShayd
April 15th, 2010, 08:15
I'd die for a huge cock, lol. But I would really rather have the foreskin.

Why? Because I know with a big dick, I'd put my self out there in harm's way (std's) just because I'd wanna show it off and have it worshipped. :p

Call my logic crazy, but I know the way my mind works. I tell people all the time, when the size question comes up, that's the only reason why I'm glad I don't have a big dick. It would get, and have gotten me, into way more trouble than it would be worth.

Guess I would just rather feel whole than huge...

I know a few guys who are 6.5 or less, uncut, and would rather stay that way than think of having their foreskins gone. That made me think about what I was missing out on...

cavalier
April 16th, 2010, 08:44
Interesting question, and one which I have often thought about. What you are really asking is " how badly do you want your foreskin back?"
My answer is that even though I'm quite small, about 5 inches only,in a heartbeat I would trade a half inch off that for a half inch of overhang. I've already got full soft coverage, but it's taking forever to get that overhang...just like the progress plateau I had years ago trying to get that initial automatic rollover. Oh well, we can all fantasize about this stuff, but the ONLY thing that's really going to get you anywhere is to keep on tugging !

AshSW
December 13th, 2010, 16:15
I'm the high side of average, and pretty happy with my size. I probably wouldn't want to be bigger, due to issues around accommodation mentioned above, but wouldn't want a very small penis, either.

I think what I would really like is to have the rest of mine back. In the meantime, I'll keep on restoring. I'm already seeing greater sensitivity from where I'm gathering around the corona, and the texture of the skin is already improving. I'm quite happy and content, to be honest, and think things will only improve as my foreskin continues to grow.

Love the skin you're in :cool:

chaoscraig
December 13th, 2010, 18:57
I vote small penis with foreskin. There are many type of penis enlargement surgeries that are proven to be effective. But nothing can replace the specialized sensory, protective, and sexual function of the intact foreskin.

Colorado
December 13th, 2010, 19:35
Foreskin.....by all means. What was cut off of me....I can never get back.
I have not been with a bunch of women but the ones I have been with have told me that I am big and were very pleased with my size ....as am I.
I have been "too big" for some women which made sex uncomfortable for them. A women would have to be in the right mood and very relaxed for her to be able to take all of me comfortably which at time is a pain in the butt and interrupts love making....but there is not much I can do about it.
Those of us with a larger penis who were victims of RIC have to grow even more skin than others. I am a grower and will need about 4 inches of skin to reach my goal of a CI 8. But I am committed and I am in it for the long haul.
Having a large penis is overrated....... believe me. I would much rather be able to do many other things in life instead.
But we don't get to choose about our bodies....just our foreskin.
Colorado

TopHat
December 13th, 2010, 23:49
Personally, I would rather have an average penis that's intact. As it is, I have a below-average penis that's cut. Them's the breaks, I guess. :(

oakn
December 14th, 2010, 22:28
If I said large and I'd restore later would you, first judge me and second send me for counseling or did you actually want my opinion.

Joseph
December 14th, 2010, 23:22
Hrm... a large, keratinized, scarred, desensitized organ, or a small, normal one that feels everything and I don't need lube for...

Let me think...

I think I'll keep my small, normal penis thanks...

Jupiter
December 16th, 2010, 02:25
I refuse to make this choice.

FL_Titan
December 17th, 2010, 17:49
the answer is obvious in my opinion....easier to grow a replacement foreskin than it is to make a 3 inch dick an 8 inch dick...

WoundedBird
December 17th, 2010, 18:54
I'm 9" tightly cut. So I already have one of the options here covered, so to speak, lol.

I would trade for a 5" intact penis any day. I'm gay and prefer oral sex to anal sex anyway. I would rather have intense sensations than a big numb dick. I know what it's like to be completely numb. Also, because I am so large when erect, it is going to be extremely difficult for me to achieve erect coverage.

A small penis with a foreskin, no doubts. The penis is more important to me as a tactile organ than an aesthetic one. I find a small intact penis to be more attractive than a large cut one, anyway.

And despite the beliefs of some, it's not possible to grow back even remotely all of what was lost to circumcision. We are growing a replacement skin-sheath, not a true prepuce.

hoodrat
December 17th, 2010, 21:34
i'd take being intact any day of the week.

ctrclckws
December 19th, 2010, 04:54
Given these choices, I can't answer this one.

I just want the penis I would have had, if my mother had not had the damned doctor cut off a chunk of it.

Probably would have been average size.

Mincan
December 21st, 2010, 14:42
Small working penis works. Big useless penis is useless.

1Taoist
December 22nd, 2010, 00:48
Some part of this conversation relates to theory that even asking this question relates to the loss of some part of the original equipment.

Aesthetics aside, genital size relates to the person interacting with it, and the mind has much to do with it. Sometimes men with average dicks can seem bigger if their mind is, because perception is a funny thing; like wearing a suit makes you seem "bigger". But someone with a physically large one can almost be eclipsed if their mind is small, in a way. Simply a physically big penis is in essence itself a dull thing, cut or uncut. Intact, a man simply must expand his mind and illusion does the rest.

GSrestorer2k
December 22nd, 2010, 07:45
I'm amazed this topic isn't locked, is this really constructive to be talking about on a foreskin restoration forum. It seems detrimental to men coping with their lack of foreskin and this is just adding fuel to the fire for men who (at least in some minds and I'd imagine most who do) the burden of having a small penis. This topic seems completely pointless and is just going to cause more anxiety among the people this forum is supposed to be aiding\helping.

WoundedBird
December 22nd, 2010, 10:32
It may not be productive, but it's entertaining food-for-thought for some people, I suppose. Fortunately for us, Ron doesn't just wantonly lock threads all over the place for minor reasons like that. I appreciate that this forum isn't run that way.

If the thread seems lame to you, it's easy enough to just never enter into it...

Mincan
December 22nd, 2010, 11:44
Thread seems fine to me. I think it's interesting to get the members opinions on all matters penisy.

1Taoist
December 22nd, 2010, 20:43
Stop reminding him that his penis is small.

I think a big penis is one that you can suck on your own. I think that is the definition. Everybody in this thread should bend over right now and try to suck.

Wait a minute. If you just get really limber and stretch you can do that irrespective of penis size? Really? Damn. Have to find a new definition.

WoundedBird
December 23rd, 2010, 00:57
Sure, "large" is relative...I personally don't care about the size of my partner's penis. I sincerely do find my penis's large size an impediment to my restoration. Being big doesn't make sex feel any better...

GSrestorer2k
December 23rd, 2010, 02:55
Stop reminding him that his penis is small.

I think a big penis is one that you can suck on your own. I think that is the definition. Everybody in this thread should bend over right now and try to suck.

Wait a minute. If you just get really limber and stretch you can do that irrespective of penis size? Really? Damn. Have to find a new definition.

Way to troll\flame. The point was that a topic that could distraught members seems not worth keeping open.

If I was insecure about my size (I never have been) I wouldn't have posted that. It's incredibly stupid to have a topic as pointless as this one, and then also is probably causing unneeded anxiety for a forum that's primarily about making people FEEL MORE COMFORTABLE ABOUT THEIR OWN SEXUALITY and then they have to come here and see this crap. No wonder you got to 2000+ posts with contentless garbage.

But yeah, go on thinking ZOMG YOU HAVE A SMALL PENIS THATS WHY YOU SAID THIS, I'm sure that's your strategy for coping when you're wrong.

WoundedBird
December 23rd, 2010, 13:46
I agree that this thread is not really an important one, but Ron isn't one to just go around locking every thread that is superfluous. Personally I am frustrated by boards where the Mods are lock-happy. I don't know if this board primarily exists to make people feel better about their own sexuality...though that is part of most people's goal with restoration, I agree. I think the boards can mean many things to different individuals.

I agree that the thing about auto-fellatio is bizarre and irrelevelent.

Personally I don't care what size anybody else's penis is. I was just stating a fact in that my large penis is actually an impediment to my restoration...it makes it far more difficult. I genuinely would trade my large cut penis for a small intact one any day of the week. And for those with small, cut penises...gaining erect coverage will be that much easier. How much pleasure one can give and get is what's important in matters of sex, not statuesque size...

Tug N' Wear
January 4th, 2011, 21:38
I think what is most interesting about these types of topics and questions is what is not mentioned. Many men obsess with their length but never think about the woman that needs to receive the equipment (comfortably). I am confident (based on my experience) that stabbing the uterus can be quite painful. I know everyone's mileage will vary on this subject but being hung like a yack may not always be advantageous to my above point.

Woof.

1Taoist
January 7th, 2011, 11:03
Yack yack yack. Thats the sound they make blowin you.

gayboyncolorado
February 8th, 2011, 02:08
I would rather have my foreskin attached than have a huge penis. :cool:

walkingxshadow
January 10th, 2013, 10:45
new to this but i was gifted with a big one(8.5 inches) and i wouldnt trade an inch just for foreskin. thats why im restoring. i want both.

RenewedDude
January 10th, 2013, 20:05
I would give up a few inches for an intact foreskin in a heartbeat. It might take years of dedicated PE to get my size back, but my restored size would be 100% of what I was born with. Thats not the case with restoring foreskin...

Chipperman
January 10th, 2013, 21:29
Walkingshadow- I went through and re-read this thread from a couple of years ago and a lot of different questions came to mind about people who answered similarly to yourself.

Would you have to agree that wanting a larger cut cock over a smaller uncut cock is purely aesthetic? To me it would have to be completely aesthetic. I personally believe that this is exactly what is wrong with our society, we value how we look over how we actually feel. It seems to me to be so superficial to want a big cock when it won't even please the person who is using it, but instead you want the big cock because of the image it presents to others.

I would gladly trade a 9 inch cut cock for a 4.5 inch uncut cock without even a hesitation. You have to remember, no matter how big or small your cock is, if it is cut, than you are not going to be pleasing your partner, period. If you have a 9 inch uncut cock or a 4.5 inch uncut cock, you're pleasing your partner, not because of the size, but because of the foreskin.

RenewedDude
January 11th, 2013, 00:38
If you have a 9 inch uncut cock or a 4.5 inch uncut cock, you're pleasing your partner, not because of the size, but because of the foreskin.

I respect your opinion here, but I disagree. It's kind of a long story (no pun intended), but essentially, I've got some experiences with several girls that directly contradict what you claim. In order of least to greatest impact on sexual satisfaction, the determining factors seem to be physical attractiveness, presence of foreskin, skillful foreplay, penis size, how said penis is utilized. Foreskin is pretty low on the list. While size (to a point - which seems to be between 8" and 9" max) does make a difference, it seems sensitivity to your partner does more to satisfy her than any other single factor.

A big dick wont get you anywhere if you don't understand women.

uncut_guy
January 11th, 2013, 02:13
Oh-- FTR, I chose small penis with foreskin. What are you going to do with a big numb dick? Look at it?

how about a big penis and doing restoring? :p

Lyle Croft
January 12th, 2013, 00:39
It would depend on how "small" the penis would be, i certainly wouldn't want a micro penis :(

mark85
January 13th, 2013, 12:09
Small with foreskin. I couldn't care less about my size, or what other people think about my size. However, not having a foreskin triggers suicidal thoughts in me. So yeah, having a big dick would do nothing for me, and I really don't see the value in it other than some people's arbitrary aesthetic preferences. Personally, I think people's obsession with penis size is juvenile, and there's no excuse for an adult to even give a shit outside of the real physical differences it might make in certain sex acts.

Foreskin Timelapse Guy
January 13th, 2013, 14:13
Foreskin. Easy... not even close. What good is a big dick if you can't even feel anything

walkingxshadow
January 14th, 2013, 13:50
Walkingshadow- I went through and re-read this thread from a couple of years ago and a lot of different questions came to mind about people who answered similarly to yourself.

Would you have to agree that wanting a larger cut cock over a smaller uncut cock is purely aesthetic? To me it would have to be completely aesthetic. I personally believe that this is exactly what is wrong with our society, we value how we look over how we actually feel. It seems to me to be so superficial to want a big cock when it won't even please the person who is using it, but instead you want the big cock because of the image it presents to others.

I would gladly trade a 9 inch cut cock for a 4.5 inch uncut cock without even a hesitation. You have to remember, no matter how big or small your cock is, if it is cut, than you are not going to be pleasing your partner, period. If you have a 9 inch uncut cock or a 4.5 inch uncut cock, you're pleasing your partner, not because of the size, but because of the foreskin.

Well seeing as I already have a big cock I know what its like. And yes its awesome! I'm still a virgin so I have no experience as to women ect but I imagine that they rather have a cut cock that they can feel over an uncut they can't.

intact
January 14th, 2013, 14:21
Well seeing as I already have a big cock I know what its like. And yes its awesome! I'm still a virgin so I have no experience as to women ect but I imagine that they rather have a cut cock that they can feel over an uncut they can't.

hmm tight cut vagina or loose intact vagina?

violated
January 14th, 2013, 14:32
Id take the intact cock!-search results .02 seconds! (tight cut vagina... lol,lol)

Chipperman
January 14th, 2013, 21:00
RenewedDude- I'm not sure who those girls are that you are gathering this information from but they must be an exception to the rule. I highly doubt that penis size leads to greater sexual satisfaction than an intact penis would. Actually I am most certain that a large cut penis is actually extremely detrimental to a girl's sexual experience.

WalkingShadow- You claim that having a big dick is awesome, but yet you are a virgin. I am assuming that you think it is awesome because of how it looks. Trust me, a big cut cock will actually hurt the girl because of the friction and lack of gliding action. So I think that a big dick is worse than a small uncut dick. At least the uncut dick won't hurt the girl during sex.

Runsfromknives
January 14th, 2013, 23:58
I dont know how big or how small we are talking here. I dont really want a small penis or a big one. I have had sex with women that are so tight it hurts them, and its no fun at all. I have had sex with women that are so loose I cant even tell if my penis is inside of them, or sliding around between their legs.

If I had to choose between 9inches cut, and 4.5 uncut I would probably choose 4.5 uncut. It would be more pleasure for me, and I personally am only attracted to small, fit, tight girls.

Sex for women is mostly a mental/emotional game, so if you have skills 4.5 will work fine. Women wont admit to being satisfied with 4.5, but if the lights are out, and they dont see it they wont know the difference between 4.5 and 6.

random1
January 15th, 2013, 06:47
I dont know how big or how small we are talking here. I dont really want a small penis or a big one. I have had sex with women that are so tight it hurts them, and its no fun at all. I have had sex with women that are so loose I cant even tell if my penis is inside of them, or sliding around between their legs.

If I had to choose between 9inches cut, and 4.5 uncut I would probably choose 4.5 uncut. It would be more pleasure for me, and I personally am only attracted to small, fit, tight girls.

Sex for women is mostly a mental/emotional game, so if you have skills 4.5 will work fine. Women wont admit to being satisfied with 4.5, but if the lights are out, and they dont see it they wont know the difference between 4.5 and 6.

I'd choose uncut. Blowing an uncut penis would be better (As a Heterosexual guy with slight homosexual erotic thoughts and feelings) than a cut cock. For me, I have a curvature, which bugs me to no end. It would take years to turn the curvature around and lots of trail-and-error and learning from mistakes like too much tension and stuff.

I know that it's not how big it is that matters, it's how you use it.

To please a girl, the smooth buildup of foreplay and natural transition into sex would get a girl hot in heals in bed with you. Girls want to bang as much as guys, but they don't say 'I want to fuck' to a guy unless she's some party chick eyeing a masculine fun guy who approaches her with the same intention, or just a girl who wants to have sex. Why should anyone judge anything? As long as no one is hurt, it's fine.

Of-course you can get a bigger penis. No I am not advertising something like 'Get 4 inches in 4 weeks' scam. You can get an inch in 4 months, or so. Clinical Studies and Trails offer the most accurate results, not marketing.

uncut_guy
January 15th, 2013, 07:18
RenewedDude- I'm not sure who those girls are that you are gathering this information from but they must be an exception to the rule. I highly doubt that penis size leads to greater sexual satisfaction than an intact penis would. Actually I am most certain that a large cut penis is actually extremely detrimental to a girl's sexual experience.

WalkingShadow- You claim that having a big dick is awesome, but yet you are a virgin. I am assuming that you think it is awesome because of how it looks. Trust me, a big cut cock will actually hurt the girl because of the friction and lack of gliding action. So I think that a big dick is worse than a small uncut dick. At least the uncut dick won't hurt the girl during sex.
But a intact foreskin naturally limits how much can put in length wise . I may still have my v-card my self but it happens with toys.
Forcing the penis into the toy more hurts a lot.

walkingxshadow
January 15th, 2013, 13:13
I'm 8.5 inches erect. And I have 2 fleshlights. and I've never had issues using them. Granted I have to lube. And another reason id rather have a big cut penis then a small intact one is because that's what I already have. I don't know anything about being intact. Just started restoring. But I like having a hand full when ever I take myself in hand. I would know what to do with one almost half the size with or without foreskin.

AnonL
January 15th, 2013, 20:44
Unmutilated penis, no contest. You can pleasure women in many ways besides using penis. But the pounding, friction, and inability to orgasm naturally is sure to be a bigger killer of intimacy than having a small penis. I think this is highly analogous to small natural tits or huge fake ones. I'd take the small and natural any day (or huge and natural too heh).

Comicking45
January 16th, 2013, 00:01
Well I consider myself to be average for my age but I'm pretty young so there's no telling, but I have always said to myself Id stay this size my whole life for a FS. A slick nice intact penis that tends to be on the small side or a hulking dry keratinized cock that is impossible to jerk off because there's just enough scar tissue there that your dick don't fall off.

Dr. Cool
January 16th, 2013, 05:44
I suppose everybody here will declare "aye" if I say that I prefer having a working, hard-as-a-rock, orgasmic dick of any size to having a useless, soft, anorgasmic dick of huge size... Anyone for "nay"? :D

djdude223
January 16th, 2013, 17:37
If I had to choose, an avg sized or slightly below avg sized intact penis for me.

It's those huge guys with long foreskins that I am so envious of!

alex-oh
January 31st, 2013, 06:45
But a intact foreskin naturally limits how much can put in length wise . I may still have my v-card my self but it happens with toys.
Forcing the penis into the toy more hurts a lot.

Is that because it's pulling your frenulum tight? You might have a tight(er) frenulum (shorter relative to the size and geometry of your penis).

I have to pull the skin on my penis back much further than I ever normally would to make my frenulum pull the meatus down noticeably. I don't even ever remember noticing that was possible before reading about frenular chordee recently, and wondering if my penis was able to do that.

I also found out it really stings for more than 24 hours if I pull it until it stings slightly for a second. I would imagine this ability to tear easily (and feel a lot of pain for it) must be part of why it's thought to be difficult to correct frenulum breve with gentle tension-induced growth.

jon86
January 31st, 2013, 07:48
I'm average, between 6.5-7 and out of experience girls don't like big dicks.

Men have it engrained in them through porn that bigger is better. It's bollocks. Plenty of experience with my fiancée in the past where she's been quite sore afterwards, but since restoring, it's been much easier going for the both of us.

Mitchell756
February 16th, 2013, 01:09
Leave the male sexual anatomy alone and let nature sort it out.



But my choice was to have all of the parts that human males evolved to have.

shiro
February 28th, 2013, 01:52
As a young teen I think I would have wished for a huge one. Things change and for a few years I have been nostalgic for my foreskin. If I got offered a huge cut cock or a smaller uncut I would take the smaller uncut. I just want what nature gave me :D

tzj38
February 28th, 2013, 10:41
If it's huge and cut, you'll likely cause great discomfort and pain in your partner. Chaffing, bleeding, tearing etc. Plus you'll have a desensitized member unable to provide much sexual pleasure for you. There is an optimal length and circumference penis range for the average women. If you are too big and cut, you'll have to go very slow with LOTS of lube. If you are too small and uncut, you penetrate and use other methods for getting her off. But if woman can get off with a finger, most small uncut penii should be able to get her off.

tootype2crazy
March 9th, 2013, 02:42
I voted a huge one without, because I would restore it, which is what I'm doing anyway :).

SDstreet
March 21st, 2013, 15:34
I voted a huge one without, because that is what I have and I am successfully restoring my foreskin. I too am 8.5 inches and concur with an earlier comment about preferring to have a large dick because that is what I am used to. The foreskin (or lack of) I can change, and have made much progress toward that goal (refer to my progress albums). Being born with a micro-penis would not be something that I could change. BTW, my wife greatly appreciates my X-Large tool in both its circumcised and now foreskinned state ;) All in all she does prefer the gliding action of intercourse now that I am almost fully restored.

stretchmyhoodie
March 22nd, 2013, 17:19
I voted for what comes natural and what works well without intervention in most cases. (A natural penis with all its normal size and features.)

MajesticMusic
April 19th, 2013, 19:25
I voted for the small penis with a foreskin because it whole!

Nosaj
April 21st, 2013, 13:58
I couldn't bring myself to vote either. If faced with a hypothetical scenario where I could choose between the two extremes, I would choose neither. My current size is pretty much normal based on what I know of such things, unremarkable one way or the other. If the choice was between having a significantly larger, but still mutilated, penis and being basically being the way I would have been had I not being mutilated in the first place, I'd choose the latter in a heartbeat. Strangely, the subject was adressed in a party I went to a few months ago. I posted about it in another thread, so Ill just copy and paste what I wrote there.

I was talking with two casual aquaintances, one male and one female. The subject turned to the girl's ex-boyfriend. The guy asked if it's true that Andrew (the ex-boyfriend) has a huge penis. The girl confirmed it. I asked her to define "huge", and she did. I nodded in admiration. Good for Andrew. The other guy said "Yeah, but he's Jewish, so he'll be circumcised, right?"
I stayed silent as I always do whenever anyone brings up the subject. The girl confirmed that Andrew is indeed circumcised. The guy grimaced with empathy, and made some comment, the gist of which was that if he had to give up his foreskin, then having a huge penis wouldn't be worth it.

AtheistMetal
November 16th, 2013, 20:53
I would take ANY uncircumcised penis over ANY circumcised one.

Sky7
November 16th, 2013, 23:12
I chose 'small with foreskin'. Of course, this is a hypothetical situation. So, mine is 8 inches erect as it is, and maybe 3-4 flaccid. I would very happily trade off a couple of inches (maybe even half the total) for what was supposed to one day be my entire foreskin. Why? Because I would rather be able to feel great amounts of sexual pleasure and have all those great nerves; and located where they should have been, than to have a large, dry and scarred penis with limited function/feeling and a tendency to be sore after almost every use.

As long as it's not a micropenis or something that causes real problems, I'd be happy with the foreskin. I just wish the damage hadn't happened in the first place. Now, of course I'm restoring so one day I should have both benefits, although of course not as good as it would have been had a certain Dr. Dumbshit not decided to profit off of me when I was born. Oh well... At least action is being taken to compensate for the damages, at the expense of my own time, money, and effort. But I'm beginning to digress here, so that's enough for now.

Menthol
November 17th, 2013, 06:28
I would prefer the intact penis any day. What's "small" anyway if not the average size cock?

And fun fact, evolution invented the bone-less growing penis in humans alongside the more complex foreskin. Those were the advantageous features back in the day. Yet so many people here seem obssessed with size.

angeyatparents
November 17th, 2013, 23:01
In my opinion A better way to word the question would be:


Would you rather have an 8 x 6 cut cock without possibility of restoration

Or Would you rather have an intact 6 x 4.5 cock (same proportions/appearance)

angeyatparents
November 17th, 2013, 23:02
I chose 'small with foreskin'. Of course, this is a hypothetical situation. So, mine is 8 inches erect as it is, and maybe 3-4 flaccid. I would very happily trade off a couple of inches (maybe even half the total) for what was supposed to one day be my entire foreskin. Why? Because I would rather be able to feel great amounts of sexual pleasure and have all those great nerves; and located where they should have been, than to have a large, dry and scarred penis with limited function/feeling and a tendency to be sore after almost every use.

As long as it's not a micropenis or something that causes real problems, I'd be happy with the foreskin. I just wish the damage hadn't happened in the first place. Now, of course I'm restoring so one day I should have both benefits, although of course not as good as it would have been had a certain Dr. Dumbshit not decided to profit off of me when I was born. Oh well... At least action is being taken to compensate for the damages, at the expense of my own time, money, and effort. But I'm beginning to digress here, so that's enough for now.

you've been restoring close to a year now. what methods do you use and how have the results been?

Sky7
November 18th, 2013, 17:59
you've been restoring close to a year now. what methods do you use and how have the results been?I've been trying different methods such as manual and the TLC-X (unfortunately the pusher and the sides of the cone dig painfully into my inner foreskin and glans and leave red lines - I guess it wasn't the device for me in particular, but other guys have much better luck with it... I think once I grow more skin I might check again to see if that was causing the problem). Haven't been able to stick to a proper schedule but I try to do some restoring every day. It's a little inconsistent, really. As far as results go, I haven't noticed much of anything outside of what seems to be initial loosening, which has gotten me where I am now... But at least some may be real growth. Recently I decided to try the DTR and the air kit to use with it last week, and I've been doing inflating (for 15-20 minutes or for as long as I can take at least once or twice a day) and some regular shaft skin tugging (every other day, but my skin has gotten very dry and chaffed when doing this; making it possibly prone to tearing, and I think I may need to buy some coconut oil or something). Too soon to tell if this is working but as soon as I know I see 100% unmistakeable results I will let you guys know. If anyone has more questions for me, go ahead and drop 'em on my profile page.

th3ro
February 22nd, 2014, 02:32
I'm very much undecided on this poll, so I didn't vote. I'd rather keep my normal size (not huge, but certainly not small..) and have a foreskin. Here's to restoring!:)

Acrys
February 22nd, 2014, 02:40
I should have had both ]:

Wesley
February 22nd, 2014, 04:31
I would be thrilled if my penis was half its present size and whole.

I don't really care about size at all, as long as it makes a pointy shape away from the torso. At all. To me it's like people freaking out over their hair color.

photenman
February 22nd, 2014, 04:42
Sex for men and their partners is so much better intact, like a 10 vs a 3. It would be crazy to give that up for a bigger dong when size makes no difference.

Did you know, cut men's penises are on average 3/16ths inch shorter, less girth also.

cmike409
February 22nd, 2014, 20:08
I would chose foreskin over length!

benster1111
February 23rd, 2014, 23:12
I'm not porn star hung. I got 7" and a foreskin so I'm pretty much at the happy median.

Still, if my penis grew to porn star size, it would pretty much outgrow my foreskin and I would be the same as a circumcised man. So I picked voted that I would like a big cut dick.

th3ro
February 24th, 2014, 00:48
7" isn't exactly median according to the statistics.

If your penis grew to porn star size during puberty, why would your foreskin have stayed the same size as it is? Seems like a silly statement. Your penis certainly wouldn't spontaneously grow to porn star size after adulthood leaving your foreskin behind ....

benster1111
February 24th, 2014, 02:23
7" isn't exactly median according to the statistics.

If your penis grew to porn star size during puberty, why would your foreskin have stayed the same size as it is? Seems like a silly statement. Your penis certainly wouldn't spontaneously grow to porn star size after adulthood leaving your foreskin behind ....

I guess my statement was meant to be silly, as in tongue in cheek, and somewhat hypothetical, because that's how I interpreted the question.
I meant that if my dick were to grow spontaneously right now, it would outgrow the foreskin, as it does when you get hard and leaving the glans exposed.
And in case you didn't know, "happy median" refers not to the strictly mathematical statistic term, but is just a loose term for "not too big, not too small" and such.

Of course if you weren't so damn negative, you wouldn't read too much into it like you just did.
Anyway, never mind. **shrug**

Gooby
May 5th, 2014, 17:20
Maybe it's because I'm on the smaller side of average, but I've never understood the obsession with large penises. As someone who is typically "on bottom", I am fortunate to have never had to deal with one!

Intact ftw! As long as it's not a micropenis. I believe anything would be better than that.

10thAmi30
May 5th, 2014, 23:32
You guys have to be kidding me?!? Get the larger penis and restore!!!
I would take larger anyday.

Trombone
May 5th, 2014, 23:41
No question about it, I would take a TINY intact penis before any circumcised version. Penis size, somehow, is irrelevant to me. I think the obsession is directly linked to circumcision itself.

Filet-A-Skin
May 6th, 2014, 14:29
Depends what small is. What you call small is probably average.

Most women don't care about size.

Size doesn't matter.

Intact as long as it isn't a micropenis

parsecskin
May 6th, 2014, 14:42
Yeah man, as long as your in the 6"-7" club plus or minus a bit, who cares? It's not the size of the tool it's how you use it. If you're too big, women will be scared of it. I had a friend who was a solid 10" (intact too) and his girlfriend wouldn't fuck him because it hurt her so much. Women don't like to have their cervix pounded to pulp every time. They eventually broke up because of his size. I would much rather have my OEM foreskin on my average size dick than have to wear this contraption day in and day out.

Dr. Cool
May 8th, 2014, 06:57
Unfortunately for many, the reality is that size matters. Starting at 7.5 inches you may be a bit too large for a minority of women with the smallest vagina sizes, but for women with typical to large sizes a larger penis will allow for full stimulation of the posterior fornix, a trademark move of sexually experienced men on the large size. The typical reaction of women that had never before experienced this kind of stimulation ranges from enjoyable surprise to addiction.

The real reason why many women will say that a large penis isn't satisfactory is the incompetence of the man in charge: the cervix is very sensitive, so the man has to "feel it" with the tip of the penis and very softly and slowly find his way over it in order to reach, fill up and stretch the posterior fornix. Once correct dilation and positioning is achieved, both man and women will describe the overtaking of the cervix as a "second penetration" that happens deep inside the vagina. The gentle rubbing of the cervix plus the pressure on the posterior fornix gives women unique intense sensations.

Notice however that this is a maneuver that needs practice and gentleness. Many men are not sexually sophisticated enough to know how to do it, and will just bump the cervix like a caveman, giving rise to the myth that larger isn't necessarily better.

Not to deny on the other hand that a skillful lover of any size beats a hung troglodyte any day.

This topic can be easily found on the net, and physiological evidence of what I just described is given by studies like the one conducted by French scientists found here (http://www-psych.stanford.edu/~knutson/ans/faix02.pdf).

TopHat
May 8th, 2014, 11:26
Unfortunately for many, the reality is that size matters. Starting at 7.5 inches you may be a bit too large for a minority of women with the smallest vagina sizes, but for women with typical to large sizes a larger penis will allow for full stimulation of the posterior fornix, a trademark move of sexually experienced men on the large size. The typical reaction of women that had never before experienced this kind of stimulation ranges from enjoyable surprise to addiction.

The real reason why many women will say that a large penis isn't satisfactory is the incompetence of the man in charge: the cervix is very sensitive, so the man has to "feel it" with the tip of the penis and very softly and slowly find his way over it in order to reach, fill up and stretch the posterior fornix. Once correct dilation and positioning is achieved, both man and women will describe the overtaking of the cervix as a "second penetration" that happens deep inside the vagina. The gentle rubbing of the cervix plus the pressure on the posterior fornix gives women unique intense sensations.

Notice however that this is a maneuver that needs practice and gentleness. Many men are not sexually sophisticated enough to know how to do it, and will just bump the cervix like a caveman, giving rise to the myth that larger isn't necessarily better.

Not to deny on the other hand that a skillful lover of any size beats a hung troglodyte any day.

This topic can be easily found on the net, and physiological evidence of what I just described is given by studies like the one conducted by French scientists found here (http://www-psych.stanford.edu/~knutson/ans/faix02.pdf).

As I needed another reason to feel bad about myself and my situation.

I think I'll just stay celibate.

Trombone
May 8th, 2014, 18:48
More pandering to approval seeking beta males. Intact is what every man deserves and no circumcised penis no matter how large remotely approaches the experience -- for the owner -- of a well developed natural penis.

TopHat
May 9th, 2014, 18:31
Yeah, thanks for that.

Dr. Cool
May 10th, 2014, 03:54
My point is that, once we leave the realm of political correctness, there should be no denial that a relatively large tool with a foreskin, which can stand hard as a stone for a long time, not bent, owned by a master lover able to ejaculate on demand would be perfection. Reality is that it's hard to imagine a man that will have all this together, in part because once a guy finally learns how to make love his mojo will probably not be the same as it used to be when he just poked around mindlessly.

I'll restate the question of this thread: between having a large penis and being a skillful lover I choose to be a skillful lover without hesitation. In fact, between having a foreskin and being a skillful lover I also prefer to be a skillful lover 24/7. And love skills can be learned, but need personal investment, just like restoration.

4SkinGuy
May 16th, 2014, 16:53
I would rather have a small, sensitive, whole package than a big one and not very sensitive. Just my opinion. :)

big_boy91
June 18th, 2014, 16:37
I have a big penis but it's circumcised and sex isn't very satisfying for me. sure I can get chicks off but they always wonder why I don't cum in them and it hurts their feelings. it takes too long for me to cum and the girl gets sore so it's not worth it. I would rather have an average penis with a foreskin than my big circumcised one so that I could get off and be intimate with my partner.

loiky
June 18th, 2014, 16:44
More pandering to approval seeking beta males. Intact is what every man deserves and no circumcised penis no matter how large remotely approaches the experience -- for the owner -- of a well developed natural penis.
The fact that you used the term "beta males" makes me realize your background when it comes to the internet and explains all of your posts recently. The kind of places that use the term beta/alpha males are full of trolls like you that thrive on the insecurities of others

I'm glad you're banned, it took long enough. I hope it's an IP ban

Slothrop
June 18th, 2014, 16:53
The fact that you used the term "beta males" makes me realize your background when it comes to the internet and explains all of your posts recently

I'm glad you're banned, it took long enough. I hope it's an IP ban

Great news! Though I expect it's not the last we have heard of him. IP ban or no IP ban.

SuperDonkey
June 19th, 2014, 10:41
Tough question to answer, I guess it depends on how you define big or small. My natural length is slightly over average but still feels small! Symptom of too much porn, I guess. Given I'm restoring now and don't know what a foreskin feels like, I'd go for a bigger schlong and just continue restoring. If restoring wasn't an option... I don't know :confused: Bigger would probably serve my confidence better, even if being cut puts me in a minority in a country traditionally intact.

rjc9699
July 13th, 2014, 15:55
I have nothing to lose, so I voted for small & intact.

Since the best I can hope for though is to be small & restored, that will have to do.

Besides, I've already accepted my size as being what I was given, but what I can't accept is what was taken from me.

Mantle
July 13th, 2014, 19:11
I view it as a lot of the problems MGM victims face is about what happened to them, not what they lost. Yes, there's still some issues regarding inabilities in their penis, and I feel their pain, however, I do not think anything that could possibly be wrong with my penis could ever be as wrong as what was done to it.

I'd say small and intact. I couldn't live with such a good gift but ruined by somebody trying to make a quick buck.

WalterScottDempsey
July 13th, 2014, 19:36
I'd rather it be larger. Then I can just restore it and have a larger and restored penis. I couldn't imagine living as a 6'4 man with a <6" penis, even if it was intact.

WalterScottDempsey
July 13th, 2014, 19:38
I view it as a lot of the problems MGM victims face is about what happened to them, not what they lost. Yes, there's still some issues regarding inabilities in their penis, and I feel their pain, however, I do not think anything that could possibly be wrong with my penis could ever be as wrong as what was done to it.

I'd say small and intact. I couldn't live with such a good gift but ruined by somebody trying to make a quick buck.

That's pretty much how I feel about it. The idea just creeps the hell out of me, tying a newborn baby down and cutting up his genitals, but I do not feel like I've been ruined by it. Just find it terribly unethical.

ninja charezard
July 14th, 2014, 14:57
I have a large penis that's circumcised and I'd rather have a small penis with foreskin.

Even if I restored it, I wouldn't get the nerve endings back, and a small penis can please a girl anyway. The vagina is most sensitive at the opening; a small penis can reach this, and I hear a lot of girls say this and that they don't care if it's small.