more sensitivity

[lnny0909]

when my foreskin is restored and even when it is being restored ill have more sensitivity does this mean that during sex it will make me wanna cum faster? Thanks

[admin]

I heard a sex doctor on Victoria Zdrok's radio show say there is no such thing as pre-mature ejeculation. You climax when you climax, and if your partner isn't satisfied, stimulate him/her other ways until you're ready to use your penis again.

In my case, I have no trouble giving my wife 2 or 3 orgasms during intercourse even though I'm quite restored and sex feels a lot better than it did before restoration. It's almost like it's so good the whole time that I'm in no hurry at all to get to the big finish.

-Ron

[David]

One of the pro-circ myths that has been around for a while is that circ makes a guy "last longer." If that were true, after the routine infant circumcision custom got started in the U.S. (where at one point some 90% of babies were being cut), premature ejaculation would have died out. Obviously it hasn't. I think premature ejaculation is more mental than physical. The increased sensitivity from FR doesn't have anything to do with "lasting longer."

[ss748]

One of the pro-circ myths that has been around for a while is that circ makes a guy "last longer." If that were true, after the routine infant circumcision custom got started in the U.S. (where at one point some 90% of babies were being cut), premature ejaculation would have died out. Obviously it hasn't. I think premature ejaculation is more mental than physical. The increased sensitivity from FR doesn't have anything to do with "lasting longer."

I saw elsewhere people have said it does help last longer, as there is more pleasure in the process as compared to the ending, so being able to take your time as compared to going crazy just to get to the ending

still got wa ways to go to find out though

[chobbs]

Prior to restoring I always lasted waaaaaay too long. I never had a problem with reaching climax too soon - quite the opposite in fact. That combined with friction from no skin movement made sex very uncomfortable for my wife (regardless of lube). Restoring has solved the comfort problem and helped the time-to-climax problem but there were times that it made things worse. It was odd, because I could feel more but it was like everything wasn't lining up properly to reach climax. That happened twice and those periods lasted about 2 months each. I expect there to be a few more before I am done - it has been posited that maybe it is nerves rewiring. In any case it was frustrating the first time and not so bad the second. Overall I can reach orgasm much easier now (still not ideal IMO), but last just as long as before if I so desire. The difference is that I am "deciding" whether or not to do so now instead of there not being a choice. I can't wait until it becomes even easier.

- Chris

[neo420]

This may sound extreme for most of you guys here. But my sensitivity was 0 during my first sexual experiences (around the age of 15). I have read in other forums that some cut guys may feel in a scale to 10 around a 3, but for me it was not even 1!

A very frustrating time of my life, I thought I was being unfairly cheated :mad: I lost myself realizing that I would never feel the best thing in life which is sex, I never want to go back to those days again...

Thats why I started restoring in the first place and now things are great as the days go by. Before I had to "train" myself to reach and orgasm after I started my sexual life, it was more a mind game than a physical feeling, sometimes very frustrating and a tiring issue.

But I have to say, the only good thing out of this, is that now I am an expert in stimulating women :D And the the great part is that since I started restoring, sex couldnt get better, and girls couldnt love it more. Now I have much more sensitivity and restoration has only helped me for the best, and I dont have problems with premature ejaculation.

I will keep on restoring, and I am happy to have found the tlc products this year, sometimes I wish I could have had these products available when I was 16 years old. But life is like this, we have to fight for what we want, and I couldnt be happier that I have the resources to win this fight. Thank you all guys for your imput in this web forum, it gives me a lot of hope and the courage to continue.

KOT

P

[David]

Chris, I know just what you mean! Everybody was talking about trying to last long enough to "satisfy" the woman, and here I was, thrusting away, having to make sure there enough lubrication to make it bearable/enjoyable for her yet not too much lubrication (artificial) or I couldn't feel a thing. And after a while, my wife would ask if I wanted to stop and be brought to orgasm manually. (I never had trouble climaxing manually or orally.) Now that is no longer a problem, and my wife says (besides the more realistic time it takes for me to climax) that intercourse feels more comfortable for her because it is just as stimulating but not so much friction. (And of course masturbation is better for the same reasons: more sensitive glans + moveable skin = never being "rubbed raw.")

Prior to restoring I always lasted waaaaaay too long. I never had a problem with reaching climax too soon - quite the opposite in fact. That combined with friction from no skin movement made sex very uncomfortable for my wife (regardless of lube). Restoring has solved the comfort problem and helped the time-to-climax problem but there were times that it made things worse. It was odd, because I could feel more but it was like everything wasn't lining up properly to reach climax. That happened twice and those periods lasted about 2 months each. I expect there to be a few more before I am done - it has been posited that maybe it is nerves rewiring. In any case it was frustrating the first time and not so bad the second. Overall I can reach orgasm much easier now (still not ideal IMO), but last just as long as before if I so desire. The difference is that I am "deciding" whether or not to do so now instead of there not being a choice. I can't wait until it becomes even easier.

- Chris

[Distalero]

Just to add a swirl or two in this post's frosting:

Seems to be a spectrum of experience in how circumcision affects male sexual response, but of course all of it is anecdotal because not many studies have been done. What seems to be the case, though, is how old the male is, and/or how severe the circumcision was in terms of stripping away sensitive tissue. Because there are variables in male sexual response reflected against this issue, both physical and psychological, it's a clouded issue, not very easily commented on in the general sense. Some of what was posted above shows this, I think.

Having said that, FEMALE sexual response, so difficult to characterize in the general sense because of it's greater complexity and variation from individual to individual female, is not a good feature to reflect our issues against. In other words, because of the odds involved (many if not most women don't orgasm directly due to penetration; many prefer about 15 to 20 minutes at most, whether or not penis skin is loose enough to effect "gliding action", etc), lasting "a long time" isn't necessarily a significant issue per se, but the other things that a particular female wants are. Does that make sense? (celebrating as I write this, couple of extra beers :D).

So, communicate/negotiate with your partner, rather than think you have taken care of the situation by focusing on your penis (beers aside, that was clear enough :D).