John Lewis
September 3rd, 2010, 14:31
The post below went into this 'protection of infants' with regard to circumcision primarily. That is important.
Elsewhere there was a posting regarding children with DSDs and what happens in some of those cases (wrong decision sometimes.)
Well I looked at this website, set up to offer protection for infants born with DSDs of one sort or another, and typed in circumcision. No results. I wonder if one of the members in the USA would look and perhaps put it to them that they should include boys with 'normal penises' in their protection plans.
It could be that circumcision will not be as high on the agenda as a DSD but it might be that the site would take on board the 'NO CIRCUMCISION' stance too.
www.aiclegal.org
John
Elsewhere there was a posting regarding children with DSDs and what happens in some of those cases (wrong decision sometimes.)
Well I looked at this website, set up to offer protection for infants born with DSDs of one sort or another, and typed in circumcision. No results. I wonder if one of the members in the USA would look and perhaps put it to them that they should include boys with 'normal penises' in their protection plans.
It could be that circumcision will not be as high on the agenda as a DSD but it might be that the site would take on board the 'NO CIRCUMCISION' stance too.
www.aiclegal.org
John