Senslip site says some men can't restore

[Mincan]

"Rhe SenSlip foreskin or artificial retractable foreskin is a new concept deisgned and manufactured by Viafin-Atlas. The effects of circumcision can be overcome by wearing the SenSlip on the circumcised penis. Foreskin restoration has been around for years but many men are unable to restore their foreskin due to having had a tightly cut circumcision. The SenSlip is new foreskin which can help re-sensitize the glans and provide a healthy penis. The SenSlip is put on in the morning and worn all day. Restore sensitivity to your glans fast and wear the SenSlip. The SenSlip concept has patents pending in over 150 countries worldwide. The SenSlip is also known as synthetic foreskin and substitute foreskin."

True?

[z726]

Nah, they're just trying to sell their product. Capitalism and truth don't always go hand in hand.

I've read about a guy in Canada who tried and said he couldn't restore without surgery because his penile skin was too scarred. I've never encountered anyone online who complained of this problem, though. If there's anything left on the shaft of the penis, it can be expanded. A tight cut only means foreskin restoration will take longer.

[admin]

"Rhe SenSlip foreskin or artificial retractable foreskin is a new concept deisgned and manufactured by Viafin-Atlas. The effects of circumcision can be overcome by wearing the SenSlip on the circumcised penis. Foreskin restoration has been around for years but many men are unable to restore their foreskin due to having had a tightly cut circumcision. The SenSlip is new foreskin which can help re-sensitize the glans and provide a healthy penis. The SenSlip is put on in the morning and worn all day. Restore sensitivity to your glans fast and wear the SenSlip. The SenSlip concept has patents pending in over 150 countries worldwide. The SenSlip is also known as synthetic foreskin and substitute foreskin."

True?

I don't find that to be "stretching" the truth at all. I'm sure there are guys whose cut is so tight that - within a reasonable time-frame and within the limits of reasonable accomodations to their lifestyle - they do not find restoring feasible. I think the statement is actually useful to point out the haphazard extremes of the wanton mutilation when done in infancy.

[greg_b]

While there may be men who cannot restore, their statement is too broad in my mind, since they use ill defined words. What do "many", "unable", "restore", and "tightly cut" mean precisely?

I could easily say that I was tightly cut and was able to restore. So to me this sounds like marketing using a tactic to sell more product.

I see no reason why skin cannot be grown irregardless of how tight you are cut.

But I agree that there could be men who will have trouble, perhaps tightly cut and scar tissue, or n outer skin left, only inner, etc. I think cases like this are few and far between, and have more than tight cut as the issue.

Regards