Joseph
December 28th, 2007, 23:02
Are foreskins really gross? November 20, 2007
(original blog can be found HERE (http://intactivist.wordpress.com/2007/11/20/are-foreskins-really-gross/).)
What stunned me about this piece, artistically, colorfully portraying the beauty of normal, healthy male anatomy was how incredibly similar it looks compared to a woman's petal-like folds.
http://i197.photobucket.com/albums/aa295/kogejoe/paul.jpg
"AS EACH FORM EMERGED ON THE CANVAS,
THE JOY OF CREATION BECAME ANGER
AS I ASKED MYSELF WHY ANYONE
WOULD CHOOSE TO DESTROY THIS UNIQUE
AND BEAUTIFUL PART OF A MALE'S BODY."
Paintings by Paul Davis Jones
I (Joseph) Begin...
The female genitalia is celebrated in works of art all the time. In particular, what comes to mind is feminist artists like Georgia O'Keeffe, and works of art like Judy Chicago's "The Dinner Party." The labia and/or clitoris aren't portrayed as "extra," "ugly," "superfluous," and/or "redundant." Rather, they are portrayed as the beautiful part of a whole that they are.
http://i197.photobucket.com/albums/aa295/kogejoe/OKeeffeSmall.jpg
Works by Georgia O'Keeffe
http://i197.photobucket.com/albums/aa295/kogejoe/DinnerPartySMALL.jpg
Plates from Judy Chicago's "The Dinner Party"
It's about time somebody painted the penis in art as it is, and not as the American psyche thinks it "should be."
For what would the reaction of feminists be would that artists portrayed circumcised or infibulated vulvas?
The circumcised penis often appears in art as "just another kind of penis." Would the circumcised or infibulated vulva elicit the same reaction?
(original blog can be found HERE (http://intactivist.wordpress.com/2007/11/20/are-foreskins-really-gross/).)
What stunned me about this piece, artistically, colorfully portraying the beauty of normal, healthy male anatomy was how incredibly similar it looks compared to a woman's petal-like folds.
http://i197.photobucket.com/albums/aa295/kogejoe/paul.jpg
"AS EACH FORM EMERGED ON THE CANVAS,
THE JOY OF CREATION BECAME ANGER
AS I ASKED MYSELF WHY ANYONE
WOULD CHOOSE TO DESTROY THIS UNIQUE
AND BEAUTIFUL PART OF A MALE'S BODY."
Paintings by Paul Davis Jones
I (Joseph) Begin...
The female genitalia is celebrated in works of art all the time. In particular, what comes to mind is feminist artists like Georgia O'Keeffe, and works of art like Judy Chicago's "The Dinner Party." The labia and/or clitoris aren't portrayed as "extra," "ugly," "superfluous," and/or "redundant." Rather, they are portrayed as the beautiful part of a whole that they are.
http://i197.photobucket.com/albums/aa295/kogejoe/OKeeffeSmall.jpg
Works by Georgia O'Keeffe
http://i197.photobucket.com/albums/aa295/kogejoe/DinnerPartySMALL.jpg
Plates from Judy Chicago's "The Dinner Party"
It's about time somebody painted the penis in art as it is, and not as the American psyche thinks it "should be."
For what would the reaction of feminists be would that artists portrayed circumcised or infibulated vulvas?
The circumcised penis often appears in art as "just another kind of penis." Would the circumcised or infibulated vulva elicit the same reaction?