does religion-enforced circumcision =rape?

[MJOLNIR]

Ohh I see. Well, you should've put it in quotes.

Also, I'll make an official answer to this thread as I see notices of replies every now and then.

Generally speaking, and especially to those in grief over being circumcised and trying to undo as much of the effects as possible (which would be most of us), being circumcised can seem infinitely worse than rape. It would be infinitely worse if life was forever, but it's not.

This is due to the nature of each. Hell, if circumcision was merely the excruciating pain being delivered during those 15 minutes and we somehow grew the part back later like it was a paper cut (like namekians from the fictional series "Dragon Ball"), it can be then comparable to rape, and to some of us it would STILL be worse.

That's not how it is though. The real trauma of circumcision is that it prevents you from physical pleasure (a significant amount of it) for your entire life. Literally tons of pleasure-giving nerve endings that were supposed to be there are no longer there, the desensitized glans, etc.

If rape was a forced sexual assault as well as a mutilation of your dick then yes I would put the two side by side.

Obviously, there are exceptions to this like that one guy who posted saying he digs being circumcised more than his "rape incident".

[airpud]

Please sign my petition:

https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/pet...elony/srl3dgt4

[MJOLNIR]

I have to make an account to sign that? Lame.

And 25,000 by next month? Wtf?

And I don't think R.I.C. will be banned until many, many, many (say 100 years or more) generations have passed where America gives up on kissing Jew ass and admits that, its (most-likely) circumcised, egotistical Americans in power are just not feeling the same amount of pleasure during sexual acts as the intact world.