Erection Question

[MJOLNIR]

Hi all.

Have a question regarding erections of an intact penis. Is it that an intact penis (with a typical amount of natural foreskin) will always have mobile skin despite how erect it may be? Or can they erect so much that they become as tight as circumcised penises (and hence become rather long)?

If the latter is true then man does circumcision indeed create a "shorter" penis, which is effed up. From the beginning I always thought a foreskin just gives you some nice slack, erogenous tissue as a glider though does nothing as a lengthener. In some porn vids I watched years ago, I always wondered how some penises could be a certain length. First I thought it was due to penis enlargement pills, or the like (which may be the case, but I guess they'd still need foreskins to get longer). Now I'm starting to wonder if it's just further stretching/lengthening from the natural foreskin they have.

My second question deals with the recommended amount of "restored" skin. You see, since I have no frenulum remnant (as screwed up as that is) I'd have nothing to keep that new skin "in check". It would just be moving from one end to the other on the shaft, and to have...say, 6 or more inches of new skin with no attachment for it like a frenulum doesn't make sex or masturbation with it look pleasing or feasible. In my particular case, is more than full coverage in the flaccid state recommended? This is what I'm aiming for (currently just full coverage while flaccid). I read some guy say he's working for coverage even while erect (though I remember him saying he still had frenulum remnants), but is that wise for someone with no frenulum whatsoever? I don't think so currently.

Tell me what you think, and thanks for the replies in advance.

[antibunk]

Originally Posted by MJOLNIR

Hi all.

Have a question regarding erections of an intact penis. Is it that an intact penis (with a typical amount of natural foreskin) will always have mobile skin despite how erect it may be? Or can they erect so much that they become as tight as circumcised penises (and hence become rather long)?

If the latter is true then man does circumcision indeed create a "shorter" penis, which is effed up. From the beginning I always thought a foreskin just gives you some nice slack, erogenous tissue as a glider though does nothing as a lengthener. In some porn vids I watched years ago, I always wondered how some penises could be a certain length. First I thought it was due to penis enlargement pills, or the like (which may be the case, but I guess they'd still need foreskins to get longer). Now I'm starting to wonder if it's just further stretching/lengthening from the natural foreskin they have.

My second question deals with the recommended amount of "restored" skin. You see, since I have no frenulum remnant (as screwed up as that is) I'd have nothing to keep that new skin "in check". It would just be moving from one end to the other on the shaft, and to have...say, 6 or more inches of new skin with no attachment for it like a frenulum doesn't make sex or masturbation with it look pleasing or feasible. In my particular case, is more than full coverage in the flaccid state recommended? This is what I'm aiming for (currently just full coverage while flaccid). I read some guy say he's working for coverage even while erect (though I remember him saying he still had frenulum remnants), but is that wise for someone with no frenulum whatsoever? I don't think so currently.

Tell me what you think, and thanks for the replies in advance.

A man's penis skin will not be tight when the penis is erect if he has a normal intact foreskin. Some men are born with shorter foreskins than others, however. And some men receive loose circumcisions. But even with a short natural foreskin, a man is still going to have a good amount of movable skin when erect and it will not be tight.

The issue of circumcision inhibiting full penis size has come up at least a couple times on this forum. I think the general consensus is that, in certain circumstances, a tight circumcision can prevent the penis from reaching its full potential in terms of length.

Regardless of whether one has much of a frenulum remnant, it is probably advisable to grow as much skin as possible. Growing more skin will actually help the skin stay past the glans when flaccid. Once you have enough skin, it will naturally pucker up and tighten past the glans. You would have to grow A LOT of skin for sex not to be feasible. This may take around 200 years. Are you watching what you eat and taking vitamins? Haha.

But seriously, think about how tight a circumcised penis can be when erect. You would have to grow a ton of skin for that to be problematic during erection. I would just concentrate on growing skin right now, living in the moment. Odds are that sex will start to feel a lot better. If you ever get to a day where you feel that you have enough skin, that is the day you stop tugging.

[MJOLNIR]

Most excellent reply antibunk, and I still have you quoted from yesterday lol (thought it wouldn't let me fit the whole post due to a character limit).

Thnx again.

[uncut_guy]

Originally Posted by MJOLNIR

Hi all.

Have a question regarding erections of an intact penis. Is it that an intact penis (with a typical amount of natural foreskin) will always have mobile skin despite how erect it may be? Or can they erect so much that they become as tight as circumcised penises (and hence become rather long)?

Sometimes I'll have erections that they become as tight as circumcised ones. these ones wake me up from a dead sleep.

One time it was so tight it was painful with no mobile skin at all.
I'm 7.5" length x 6.5" girth.

I have Psychological Erectile Dysfunction though, so I really do enjoy my morning wood.

[Anon47]

Yeh i think it would be optimal to have erect coverage.

I have been masturbating with the shaft skin for a month or so.

The difference between shaft skin and lube on the dick head:

If I use lube on my hand and go over the head it doesn't feel right because my hand isn't soft enough (i'm not a gardener or mechanic but human hands just aren't as soft as inner foreskin). So it feels not that good even with lube and the orgasm is very quick. It's like.. coming. gone.. Over.

If I use the shaft skin i can't feel as much yet, because I can't pull the skin high enough. But it feels less painful because i'm not running a rough hand over my skin.. I'm yanking the shaft up and down. But the orgasms last way longer using the shaft skin - less disappointment when it's over.

I am sure that full erect coverage would be great because you would have soft inner foreskin to masturbate with eventually.

[MJOLNIR]

uncut_guy how can girth be 6.5"? Isn't that the circumference around the shaft, or am I misunderstanding it?

Anon47 I know what you mean. Sometimes my right hand can have cuts since I wash them a lot and it'll be rough especially in cold weather, but my left hand is almost always smooth/soft.

The way I see it circ. is almost always a penis-shortener. My erections cause my penis to bend down somewhat. Sometimes the erections can be painful. I notice a bit of my scrotum skin pulls up to. I'm about a C1 hard and C2 soft. What does 'C' mean by the way?

__

[uncut_guy]

Originally Posted by MJOLNIR

uncut_guy how can girth be 6.5"? Isn't that the circumference around the shaft, or am I misunderstanding it?

Anon47 I know what you mean. Sometimes my right hand can have cuts since I wash them a lot and it'll be rough especially in cold weather, but my left hand is almost always smooth/soft.

The way I see it circ. is almost always a penis-shortener. My erections cause my penis to bend down somewhat. Sometimes the erections can be painful. I notice a bit of my scrotum skin pulls up to. I'm about a C1 hard and C2 soft. What does 'C' mean by the way?

__

Yes circumference around the midshaft of the penis

[MJOLNIR]

O_O