Foreskin Restoration / Intactivism Network

Go Back   Foreskin Restoration / Intactivism Network > FORESKIN RESTORATION > General Restoration Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Calendars Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

View Poll Results: Would you undergo a foreskin transplant?
No, too weird 2 4.76%
No, non-surgical methods are much better 11 26.19%
Yes, only if the foreskin functions perfectly 25 59.52%
Yes, even if there is no sensation in the frenulum and ridged band 4 9.52%
Voters: 42. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 30th, 2009
BillyC2000 BillyC2000 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 20
Post Foreskin Transplant

I ask this question out of pure curiosity:

How many of you would want a foreskin transplant from another man that chose to have a circumcision?


This assumes, of course, that the procedure is even possible. There would be a few pros and cons to this:

Possible Pros:
  • Functioning frenulum and ridged band
  • Complete glans coverage with normal uncircumcised taper
  • May have sensitivity in transplanted frenulum

Possible Cons:
  • Scars from the operation
  • Mismatch of skin tones between transplanted and existing skin
  • Lifetime of anti-rejection medication
  • May not have sensitivity in transplanted frenulum
  • The operation itself

As far as my research of the medical literature, this has not been done. I'm not sure if it's because this is not possible or no one is willing to try.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old March 31st, 2009
DPX1 DPX1 is offline
Barbarism is NOT Medicine
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 369
Exclamation Re: Foreskin Transplant

It's not very viable because of the rejection problem.

People who get organ transplants therefore have to take powerful immunosuppressant medication to keep their bodies from attacking the donor tissues, but also keeping their cells from fighting infection. On top of that, even with the drugs, rejection can still occur if the donor isn't a good enough match. This is why people get transplants from family members when possible.

A fully functioning foreskin would be nice, but risking an unprecedented complicated procedure that could have gnarly aesthetic results, and having to spend the rest of my life in what is essentially chemically-induced AIDS, blows the doors off of that option in my opinion.

Now, if they could clone me a foreskin from my own cells, or even grow me a new penis for that matter, I'd be more willing to try it. I'm still apprehensive about people getting anywhere near my junk with scalpels again, but I would love to be whole. Unfortunately medical science isn't that good yet.

I wish I could magically regenerate.

EDIT: Oh sorry, I missed the part where you mentioned anti-rejection medication. Didn't mean to be redundant.
That stuff is really nasty, though. As advanced as medicine has gotten, transplant patients can have life expectancies anywhere from 8-20 years depending on the tissues received, just because of the colossal risk of infection that comes with anti-rejection drugs.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old March 31st, 2009
Night tug Night tug is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: way down in dixie
Posts: 89
Default Re: Foreskin Transplant

Absolutely not. I will stretch and tug and make the most of what I have. When I get more, coverage will be more reliable.I am sitting in this chair,at this computer,with near complete coverage. ( No thank you) ,( I will not wear another mans foreskin). I have what is acting as a foreskin, atleast while I sit.(Hey, its a start).
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old March 31st, 2009
Americut's Avatar
Americut Americut is offline
I didn't ask for this.
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Land of no-choice
Posts: 589
Default Re: Foreskin Transplant

I had to go with No, non-surgical...

Immediately after voting, i realized that i first should have asked if you meant that option 3 was absolutely guaranteed. Still, it is impossible to guarantee such a thing. Therefore, with the risks still involved in such a procedure today, I have to decline.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old March 31st, 2009
BillyC2000 BillyC2000 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 20
Default Re: Foreskin Transplant

Quote:
Originally Posted by Americut View Post
I had to go with No, non-surgical...

Immediately after voting, i realized that i first should have asked if you meant that option 3 was absolutely guaranteed. Still, it is impossible to guarantee such a thing. Therefore, with the risks still involved in such a procedure today, I have to decline.
I guess what I meant was that the operation had been done before, and you've seen and liked the results. Sort of like any other reconstructive surgery, you can't be guaranteed what how yours will turn out, but you can gauge it by what has been done before.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old March 31st, 2009
Tormod - IRL's Avatar
Tormod - IRL Tormod - IRL is offline
Ribbed for extra sensitivity
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: UK/Ireland
Posts: 256
Default Re: Foreskin Transplant

No, not for me.
I couldn't let anyone near my penis again with a sharp object.
Anyway, I'm now at about CI 7 or 8, full flaccid coverage and highly realistic.
__________________
Tormod
__________________
"Work is the curse
of the drinking classes"

- Oscar Wilde
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old April 1st, 2009
Bral's Avatar
Bral Bral is offline
Funny. I don't remember signing the form.
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 269
Default Re: Foreskin Transplant

I would go with option 3 (yes if it would function perfectly), but only if there is no anti-rejection medication I'd have to constantly take, if the procedure had a 95% success rate or greater, and if the donor was an individual who willingly underwent the procedure (and NOT if it was taken from a corpse!).

As I think about it though, it really would be a lot to think about. Though I would be getting structures back, they wouldn't really be MINE.. they would have been meant for someone else... but that someone didn't want them. It's a lot to think about.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old April 3rd, 2009
kiltie kiltie is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Painesville, Ohio
Posts: 22
Default Re: Foreskin Transplant

I guess everyone looks for a quick fix, including myself. Of course I voted yes!!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old April 3rd, 2009
RandyL's Avatar
RandyL RandyL is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 83
Default Re: Foreskin Transplant

I'm hoping that with stem cell research, eentually doctors will be able to shoot some stem cells into your dick and they will somehow know that you don't have a frenulum and foreskin, and it'll magically grow back on its own.

Sure would be nice!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old April 4th, 2009
European European is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 18
Default Re: Foreskin Transplant

I'm obsessed by the idea that plalstic surgeons one day will be able to design perfect foreskins or could innervate restored foreskins with nerv-endings. This idea, that I would have a normal functional foreskin is an obsessive thought of mine every day. But I'm afraid that no scientists conduct research on this.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:55.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.