![]() |
|
|||||||
| Calls to Action Bail someone out, sign a petition, write a legislator, phone a DJ, etc. Use FORUM TOOLS to Subscribe and get e-mail alerts when new items are posted. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
This time, it looks truthful. Just go onto google and click on news.
Found this little bit you guys might be interested in posting in... http://health.usnews.com/blogs/on-wo...-to-women.html
__________________
"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has." ~Margaret Mead |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Notice the higher rate of condom AVOIDANCE by the circed group. No surprise to us with reduced sensitivity.
One can reasonably assume that the same condom avoidance of the circumcised will also negate any "benefit" to those men from having their foreskin removed. The "protection" of circumcision is being exposed as the lie that it is.....there is hope truth will prevail! ![]() |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I particularly like how in the article I read that said "After circumcision, condom use is still essential" ...... then why the fuck gets circumcised? It's disgraceful that these articles rarely mention that condom use is far far more effective then ANY circumcision study has ever shown, as well as they avoid saying that there are studies that show no effect.
__________________
Start: CI3, Currently: CI7, going for 8 |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|