Foreskin Restoration / Intactivism Network

Go Back   Foreskin Restoration / Intactivism Network > INTACTIVISM > Press Room
Register FAQ Members List Calendars Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Press Room One article per thread, please

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 27th, 2009
Joseph's Avatar
Joseph Joseph is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,796
Default 2009-09-26 Nation - EXPERTS: "Circ Not Enough to Stop HIV"

http://www.nation.co.ke/News/-/1056/663870/-/uneiet/-/

Circumcision not enough to stop HIV, experts warn experts

By ARTHUR OKWEMBAPosted Saturday, September 26 2009 at 20:26

As thousands of young men in Nyanza Province troop to health centres to be circumcised in hopes of fending off HIV, new studies show it might be too early to claim victory. Although circumcision has been touted as one of the ways to prevent HIV infection, recent findings show an increase in HIV infection in regions where most males are circumcised. (These findings aren't very recent; data from countries that showed this was the case was omitted from the current studies being used...)

According to findings of the Kenya Aids Indicator Survey (Kais) released last week, North Eastern and Coast provinces, where 97 per cent of males are circumcised, registered an increase in HIV prevalence.

Within a span of five years, HIV prevalence in North Eastern and Coast provinces increased from 0 to 1.0 per cent and from 5.8 per cent to 8.3 per cent respectively. In the same period, HIV prevalence in Nyanza Province, where about 48 per cent of males are circumcised, stood at 15 per cent, the highest in the country.


These are sobering statistics for young men who have rushed to get circumcised in he belief that doing so would provide complete protection from HIV infection. The new findings of growing HIV prevalence among circumcised males indicates the practice cannot completely protect an individual from HIV infection unless it is combined with other practices including using condoms, being faithful to one partner, or abstaining from sex. (What's the point in getting circumcised then?)

Health officials acknowledge that getting people to look at circumcision in the larger context of other factors and strategies can be challenging. “The figures from these two provinces are sending a warning that circumcision alone is not the magic bullet to controlling the disease. Other methods have to be used in combination,” said Dr Ibrahim Mohammed, Head of National Aids and STD Control Programmes in the Ministry of Medical Services.

The increase in prevalence in communities that circumcise indicates there are other factors that contribute to the spread of the disease among males in addition to being uncircumcised. Multiple sexual partners, low condom use and alcohol and drug abuse are some of the factors.

“Unless we address all the reasons predisposing people to HIV infection, we might not make much headway,” said Judy Adero, who has lived with the virus for nine years. (and yet...) [b]But scientists still believe circumcision will result in the lowering of HIV prevalence in provinces such as Nyanza.[/i]

Dr David DeCock, director of the Kenya office of the US Centers for Disease Control, said (despite blatant evidence to the contrary...) there is no doubt that circumcision prevents HIV infection. The Kais study shows HIV prevalence among circumcised men aged between 20 and 64 years was approximately three to seven times lower than among uncircumcised men in the same age range. (So this study trumps all others, is that it?)

The study further shows that the rate of HIV prevalence among circumcised men was 3.9 per cent compared to 13.2 per cent among the uncircumcised men. Buoyed by (or rather, LATCHING ON TO) these significant differences, the government and other organisations have opened 200 circumcision centres.

More than 30,000 men have been circumcised since the call first went out; the target of 100,000 circumcised men is expected to be reached by year’s end. (Oh, there's a QUOTA! Fancy that...)

Meanwhile, female activists have criticised the way the whole operation is being carried out, arguing that it is making women more vulnerable as men engage in sex with multiple partners secure in the knowledge that they are safe.

The decision to adopt circumcision as one method in the HIV prevention strategy has been informed by research findings of three main studies done in South Africa, Uganda and Kenya which showed circumcision to reduce the risk of HIV infection by up to 60 per cent. (And the recent findings that show circumcision is FAILING, like others in the past, will be ignored...)

This was followed by World Health Organisation and UNAids issuing strong recommendations for increased male circumcision rates in countries where the HIV prevalence is high. Two years ago, Kim Dickson, coordinator of the joint WHO/UNAids working group that came up with the recommendations told the journal New Scientists: “We reviewed all the evidence, and the evidence is compelling.” (Actually, no, they DIDN'T "review all the evidence." They IGNORED evidence to the contrary, as is being done NOW. The question is, would they ever "review evidence" that showed that female circumcision "reduced the risk of HIV?" Or would such "studies" be thrown out? WHY the hunger to justify male circumcision only?)

In the South Africa study, circumcision was found to reduce HIV infection rates by more than 60 per cent in a group of 3,000 HIV-negative men. Of the 1,546 men who were circumcised, 20 became infected with HIV while 49 of the 1,582 uncircumcised men became infected. (So the South Africa "study" trumps the North Eastern/Coast study, where 97% of males are circumcised and registered an increase in HIV prevalence?)

The findings made the South African scientists undertake large-scale male circumcision as a possible strategy for preventing two million HIV infections and 300,000 deaths in their country over the next 10 years. In December 2006, the Data Safety Monitoring Board that was overseeing the Kenyan and Ugandan male circumcision trials announced the operation was a safe and effective way to reduce HIV infection among men.

(This article ends in overpowering the message in its headline. Circumcision does NOT work, but it must continue because of the "studies" that say it does. ???)
__________________
"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has." ~Margaret Mead
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old September 27th, 2009
Someone mundane Someone mundane is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Ca, Ontario
Posts: 667
Default Re: 2009-09-26 Nation - EXPERTS: "Circ Not Enough to Stop HIV"

Experts having to warn other so-called experts... Isn't that... Ironic?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old September 28th, 2009
Yunus's Avatar
Yunus Yunus is offline
Happy being intact in my circumcised country
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: East Java,Indonesia
Posts: 830
Default Re: 2009-09-26 Nation - EXPERTS: "Circ Not Enough to Stop HIV"

Why don't they use condom among uncircumcised males to prevent HIV infection?
__________________
The God created all things very good & useful till the end of the things.This is the fate,so don't destroy the goodness that the God gave.
Genesis 1:31 "And God saw every thing that he had made,and,behold,it was very good.And the evening and the morning were the sixth day."
Greeting,Yunus.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:23.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.