![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Have a question or two for ya:
1. What is the anatomical definition of "dermal"? 2. When an online outfit requests donations, and it states THAT is it's primary function, and no mention is made of an association with current research groups or medical facilities, or make references to past or current research models/trials, what is one to think? |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
I always thought "dermal" meant pertaining to the skin. Isn't it from Greek?
About orgs looking for money. I think lots and lots of background info is needed. - backgrounds of all the people involved, address (of office), photos of the people, links... Not only is this stuff minimum, if we have to ask for it, it's almost too late to undo some negativity. And by forcing the openness issue, I was only trying to help. So far we have these reasons for (insert org starting with F) not putting people's information up or for mentioning them in the forum: - the Catholic Church might find out - skin care companies might find out - personal crisis The "about us" page probably needs time to be changed. Maybe things don't happen overnight. But if you ask me, it's really fishy indeed. If we have to ASK for this information, I think some of us already have a certain impression. It won't be easy to undo this impression or overwhelm it with something really positive. I, for one, have DEFINITELY given up on any expectation of any miracle operation within the next 10 years. I just don't buy it. Call me a jerk. Call me whatever you want. Call me negative. Just don't call me late for dinner, because that might spoil my midnight snack. I think the Catholic Church might be too busy covering up pedophilia at the moment to bother with (insert org starting with F). I think the skin care companies have already scammed millions of naive women out of their husbands' money. Do you think they will even notice anyone else? Will L'Oreal hire hitmen or something? Or copy the idea????????????? Are we talking potential big bucks here????????? OK, away from the limelight and the big bucks and back to the little restorer: My mitosis mantra: weight gravity tape |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
HEY, JERK. I didn't say The Catholic Church needed to be deceived. Individual decision makers/curators of shrines or sites which might possibly need renovation are the people who don't need to stumble upon Foregen and link it to the artist they were consdering hiring.
JUST STOP acting like there is some kind of fucking conspiracy. There is one very busy benevolent guy who doesn't know shit about editing web sites and he'll get to your zillion questions and proposals when he has time. Until then don't donate if you don't like the smell of things. But shut the fuck up with the conspiracy mongering. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
There isn't much here I disagree with, but bit of a shotgun format, unless it's the kind of free verse the Beats used during open-mic night, at that there Hungry I. If so, I like it. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|