Regenerative Medicine

[atfman]

I do not understand this clinical trial?
FOREGEN was a doctor and more talented than ATALA the CHUV.
He has already regenerated a organ?
he'll try it on an animal? : Confus:

[siog]

Originally Posted by Chris

Foregen has always been interested only in true FORESKIN regeneration. They don't want to regenerate some shaft skin. Foregen seems to be the only ones in the world who understand what we want and they understand what has to be regenerated.

Nobody else seems to care about regenerating the foreskin. They regenerate shaft skin and consider it to be "good enough".

I can only speak for myself, but to be getting some additional shaft skin is not good enough. I want a real foreskin, and Foregen is the only one that understands that.

Very true, and we already are getting shaft skin from our normal restoration methods.

I do wonder, if in the near or far future Foregen is successful...what will happen to restorer's long "faux-skins"?

Would the Foregen technique simply "regrow" parts of the foreskin's anatomy such as the ridged band and frenulum, or would it also add on the length of the restored skin? As in, if someone who is tightly circ'd has it done, let's say it grows 3" of foreskin. Say a fully restored man who has 4" of "faux-skin", would that then become 7" due to the Foregen adding on top of that? Or perhaps my questions are too advanced for the stage Foregen is at...

[Porco.Rosso]

Originally Posted by siog

Very true, and we already are getting shaft skin from our normal restoration methods.

I do wonder, if in the near or far future Foregen is successful...what will happen to restorer's long "faux-skins"?

Would the Foregen technique simply "regrow" parts of the foreskin's anatomy such as the ridged band and frenulum, or would it also add on the length of the restored skin? As in, if someone who is tightly circ'd has it done, let's say it grows 3" of foreskin. Say a fully restored man who has 4" of "faux-skin", would that then become 7" due to the Foregen adding on top of that? Or perhaps my questions are too advanced for the stage Foregen is at...

Your questions aren't too advanced for the stage Foregen is at. In fact, Vincenzo must already know the answers to them.
Unfortunately, the is under a Non Disclosure Agreement that prevent him from sharing any detail about the upcoming experiments.

However, I can tell you that the philosophy of Foregen is to find a way to regenerate everything that was lost. My take on this, and this is simply a supposition, is that Foregen will be settled only once they find the way to regenerate the foreskin as it would be if the patient hadn't been circumcised in the first place.

Hope that's enough information, I wish I could tell you more.

[atfman]

several doctors told me.
if badylack is not in the Lancet.
it's not serious.
Now, it is in Lancet.

http://www.mirm.pitt.edu/news/

[atfman]

Article interresting

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/0...56.html?page=2

[Rood]

Originally Posted by atfman

Article interresting

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/0...56.html?page=2

Yes ... the article deserved responses, too. I mean, the very idea that doctors don't respond to cries for help from genitally wounded veterans strikes a chord among those of us who were also wounded ... by those very doctors!

[dreammagii]

Hi foreskins,
Can anyone clarify for me, will Foregen's clinical trials be testing on animals?
It just occurred to me this morning, that i don't know enough about this, and the devil is in the detail.
Will they be circumcising animals, and then attempting to regenerate their foreskins? How will this clinical trial be structured?
I have no basis for this thought, but i am posing the question nonetheless.
If there will be a component of animal testing, how do we feel as a foreskin community about this?
I certainly would decline regenerating my own foreskin, at the cost of having animal testing.
Hopefully the solution to this, is that the clinical trials will be testing on willing consenting humans, rather than animals?
Enzo, can you please chime in here?
Cheers, Dream

[airpud]

A wonderful post. Yeah, who wants a foreskin with bad karma attached to it? I know one person in this country who wants a foreskin without cruelty and theft, and add to that number me, and how many more guys?

Jagd: I wouldn't put it past our enemies, the AMA and/or whoever else, to scam us about Jagd and Duck-Turd Reed.

A surgery by a pro-circumcision "duck turd"? WTF? Does no-one else smell a rat?

As I mentioned a long time ago, the USA is a risky, inefficient, and expensive climate for these trials. Unsafe indeed.

[airpud]

Originally Posted by Rood

Yes ... the article deserved responses, too. I mean, the very idea that doctors don't respond to cries for help from genitally wounded veterans strikes a chord among those of us who were also wounded ... by those very doctors!

Interesting article. Kind of makes you wonder when Americans will learn that being Israel's slave isn't such a great idea after all. Living in a shtetel, fighting proxy wars for penis-cutters... Sad, really. Isn't America's economic difficulty related to this?

Look at all the penis-cutting countries around the world and look into the daily life in those countries. What cuts gets cut. Live by the sword, die by the sword.

Don't all come at me at once with the usual "Nah! Come on! Now, you're just grasping!"

I feel like going to Denmark and asking for asylum. "I'm a male, and males are legally protected in Denmark. I renounce my US shitizenship."

Notice when he said "I lost both testicles and suffered "de-gloving" of the penis..." ('de-gloving" being a term the duck-turds would have used with him)

Um, de-gloving I'm assuming means something similar to circumcision. So in battle it's not ok? Dudes, I'm not quite seeing the logic of these duck-turds.

[Element786]

Denmark is actually a lovely country, and males are respected there and given rights, rather than just being considered fodder for immature humor and unnecessary wars of aggression. I wish I had been born in Denmark.